Human and mouse regenerative macrophages enhance beta cell survival, function, and proliferation
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
Abstract Aims/hypothesis Type 1 diabetes is an autoimmune disease caused by immune-mediated destruction of insulin-producing pancreatic beta cells. Interestingly, individuals with long-standing type 1 diabetes have residual beta cells, suggesting the existence of regenerative mechanisms that help maintain beta cell survival. Islet-resident macrophages have an important role in type 1 diabetes, and during disease progression can adopt a tissue-regenerating phenotype which may support beta cells. However, the specific roles of macrophages in beta cell survival, function, and proliferation remains poorly defined. This study aimed to elucidate how different macrophage subtypes influence beta cell survival, function, and proliferation. Methods Mouse and human islets were isolated from the pancreas and co-cultured in vitro with macrophages. To investigate whether macrophages enhance beta cell survival and function, beta cell apoptosis was measured using flow cytometry, and insulin secretion was assessed using a glucose-stimulated insulin secretion assay. We also examined whether macrophages further increased beta cell proliferation in the presence of harmine, a DYRK1A inhibitor. Finally, we evaluated the effect of islet co-culture on macrophage phenotype by flow cytometry and cytokine secretion analysis. Results We found that regenerative, but not pro-inflammatory, macrophages enhanced beta cell survival and function through mechanisms that did not require direct cell contact. Direct contact between macrophages and islets further promoted a regenerative phenotype in macrophages, characterized by increased CD206 expression and secretion of anti-inflammatory factors. Additionally, regenerative macrophages promoted beta cell proliferation in the presence of harmine. Conclusions Our findings demonstrate that regenerative macrophages support pancreatic beta cell survival, function, and proliferation. Harnessing the regenerative properties of macrophages could offer a novel strategy to promote beta cell survival and function, thereby improving outcomes for individuals with type 1 diabetes. Research in Context What is already known about this subject? Macrophages are the predominant resident immune cells within pancreatic islets in non-diabetic individuals; they contribute to tissue homeostasis and immune surveillance. Depending on their activation state, macrophages can exert either beneficial (pro-regenerative) or harmful (pro-inflammatory) effects on beta cell function. What is the key question? How do different macrophage subtypes regulate islet survival, regeneration, and function? What are the new findings? Co-culturing mouse or human islets with regenerative macrophages enhanced beta cell survival and function. When added in the presence of a DYRK1A inhibitor (harmine), they also promoted beta cell proliferation. Regenerative macrophage-derived factors promoted mouse islet function via a contact independent mechanism. Mouse islets enhanced the regenerative phenotype of macrophages. How might this impact on clinical practice in the foreseeable future? Leveraging the regenerative potential of macrophages represents a novel therapeutic approach to enhance beta cells, ultimately improving outcomes for individuals with type 1 diabetes.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction distillée sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.
Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Communication savante | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Science ouverte | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule tête enseignante, pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».