Foreign Experience in Harmonizing Legislation in the Field of Organic Production and the Possibilities for its Adaptation for Ukraine
Pourquoi ce travail est dans la base
Une base qui oublie comment elle a trouvé un travail ne peut pas être vérifiée. Voici les voies qui ont admis celui-ci.
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
The aim of the article is to systematize, analyze, and explore the possibilities for adapting foreign experience in harmonizing legislation in the field of organic production for Ukraine. The article conducts a comprehensive study of foreign experience in the harmonization of legislation in the field of organic production to determine optimal models and approaches that can be adapted in Ukraine. The focus is on analyzing the leading legal systems regulating organic agriculture in EU countries, the USA, Canada, Japan, Australia, as well as studying the role of international organizations (IFOAM, FAO, Codex Alimentarius, European Commission) in forming universal standards. Special attention is paid to the mechanisms of implementing international norms into national legal systems, the effectiveness of control, certification, labeling, and monitoring tools. Four dominant models of legal regulation have been identified: unification (EU), equivalence (Canada, Switzerland), autonomy (USA, Japan), and voluntary recognition (Australia, India). The conceptual and institutional characteristics of each model have been studied, as well as their alignment with the principles of legal certainty, proportionality, transparency, subsidiarity, and mutual recognition. Positive practices in regulatory policy, financial incentives, and institutional support for the organic sector have been analyzed. The process of harmonizing legislation in EU countries, particularly Poland, Romania, Croatia, Serbia, and North Macedonia, has been examined. It has been demonstrated that the efficiency of this process largely depends on the level of political will, administrative capacity, coordination between central and local authorities, as well as the implementation of digital monitoring tools and transparent mechanisms for interaction with agricultural producers. Particular attention is devoted to the model of multi-level governance, which includes ministries, accreditation bodies, and independent certification structures. Using Ukraine as an example, the primary challenges of implementing European standards are discussed, related to the fragmentation of legislation, insufficient development of the institutional environment, and flawed control infrastructure. A comprehensive reform model is proposed, which involves the modernization of the legal framework, the establishment of electronic registers for organic production operators, the enhancement of the certification system, and the development of a national harmonization strategy by 2030. The results of the study indicate that the implementation of an adapted regulatory model aligned with international standards will ensure the effective functioning of the organic sector, expand export potential, increase consumer trust, and improve the environmental sustainability of production.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Prédiction distillée sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.
Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Communication savante | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Science ouverte | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle