A lifespan perspective on lifelong premature ejaculation: unresolved issues and new insights
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
BACKGROUND: Despite the numerous studies dealing with lifelong premature ejaculation (LPE), significant issues remain unresolved, including the age of onset relative to sexual debut, its constancy or variation over the lifespan, how it is affected by foreplay, and whether it is altered by different types of partnered sexual activities and/or masturbation. Aim: To describe lifespan changes in PE symptomology in men with LPE. METHOD: Using a retrospective-current analysis, from an online sample of 409 men with PE, 160 identified as specifically having LPE. Data regarding PE symptomology-including lack of ejaculatory control, foreplay time and estimated ejaculation latencies (ELs) at sexual debut and currently, and other sexual characteristics-were collected to better describe and understand PE lifespan patterns in this group of men. OUTCOMES: Foreplay and EL comparisons between sexual debut and the present time, as well as EL comparisons across different types of sexual activities, including masturbation. RESULTS: Men with LPE showed strong consistency in foreplay duration and ELs ever since their sexual debut. 77% indicated no change in their PE, 18.6% reported worsening of their PE, and 2% indicated improvement since sexual debut, with only the frequency of partnered sex showing any association with the above patterns. LPE men showed some variation in ELs across different types of partnered sexual activities, and also in comparison with masturbation. CLINICAL IMPLICATIONS: Men with LPE show remarkable consistency in their short ELs with the passage of time and across different sexual activities; however, variation in EL does appear to be mildly-moderately linked to different kinds of sexual stimulation in some LPE men. STRENGTHS AND LIMITATIONS: This study is the first of its kind to adopt a retrospective-current strategy to explore lifespan changes in PE symptomology in men with LPE. Limitations may include reliance on recall of events surrounding men's sexual debut, as well as the use of social media to recruit respondents, which likely results in age, education, and socioeconomic status bias. CONCLUSION: Men with LPE show typically normal foreplay duration, along with estimated ELs of 1-2 min, both of which are consistent over their lifespan. Mild to moderate variation in ELs was associated with specific types of sexual activity, including masturbation.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction distillée sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.
Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,000 | 0,001 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Communication savante | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Science ouverte | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule tête enseignante, pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».