“I want to hear you talk with your heart”: perspectives on receiving and providing mental wellness supports during the COVID-19 pandemic within a First Nation community in Canada
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
BACKGROUND: The COVID-19 pandemic presented unprecedented challenges to local health systems, widening gaps in support and disrupting available care. Within Canada, First Nations communities have been disproportionately affected by the pandemic, which exacerbated an already strained system of appropriate services and supports. As part of a broader community-based participatory research project (The First Nations Wellness Initiative), the aim of this research was to explore how the COVID-19 pandemic affected people seeking and providing mental wellness supports within a First Nations community, with an eye to informing ways to enhance community strengths to better address pandemic-related challenges and develop community-identified opportunities for mental wellness promotion. METHODS: From September 2020 to March 2022, one-to-one interviews with people with lived experiences with mental health and/or substance use challenges (n = 2) and individuals supporting loved ones with lived experiences (n = 7) as well as two focus group discussions (i.e., with community youth (n = 5) and frontline service providers (n = 5)) were conducted in Saugeen First Nation, Ontario, Canada by a local research coordinator/Knowledge Holder. Individuals shared experiences with mental wellness and/or substance use challenges and experiences accessing/providing mental wellness supports during the pandemic. Recommendations for improving supports during and beyond the pandemic were also provided. These qualitative data were analyzed thematically, using a hybrid inductive-deductive approach. RESULTS: Challenges faced during the pandemic included difficulties finding and navigating available supports; problems connecting via virtual services; and lack of access to cultural and/or spiritual supports. Participants described relational supports (kinship, friends, the broader community) as well as formal supports (culturally-embedded programs, group supports, youth support group) as key community strengths drawn upon during the pandemic to promote mental wellness. In terms of service provision, challenges balancing differing community needs and concerns were highlighted. Participants shared ideas for expanding and adapting mental wellness promotion and supports to develop a stronger system of care for mental wellness and substance use challenges. CONCLUSIONS: The findings point to opportunities for building on existing community strengths and promoting locally-led, culturally-grounded supports for mental wellness and substance use challenges to enhance capacity of First Nations communities to support their members in the face of public health crises.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction machine sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.
Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,006 | 0,009 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,001 | 0,002 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,048 | 0,016 |
| Communication savante | 0,009 | 0,003 |
| Science ouverte | 0,003 | 0,008 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,003 | 0,007 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,004 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».