MétaCan
Menu
Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W4413231171 · doi:10.1111/nana.13116

Settling for Less: Why States Colonize and Why They Stop By McNamee, Lachlan, Princeton: Princeton University Press, 2023. xi+240 pp. £30.00 (pbk), £100.00 (hbk).

2025· article· en· W4413231171 sur OpenAlex

Pourquoi ce travail est dans la base

Une base qui oublie comment elle a trouvé un travail ne peut pas être vérifiée. Voici les voies qui ont admis celui-ci.

aboutLe titre ou le résumé porte un signal canadien du lexique géographique.
no affAucune affiliation canadienne : ce travail est invisible pour une base fondée sur la seule affiliation.
Aucune affiliation canadienne. Une base fondée sur la seule affiliation (le devis habituel) n'aurait jamais vu ce travail. C'est l'un des travaux qui justifient l'inversion de la base.

Notice bibliographique

RevueNations and Nationalism · 2025
Typearticle
Langueen
DomaineSocial Sciences
ThématiqueGlobalization and political ideologies
Établissements canadiensnon disponible
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésSettlingPolitical scienceEnvironmental scienceEnvironmental engineering

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

Concerns about injustices perpetrated by colonial enterprises, past and present, animate a wide field of scholarly studies, not to mention a world of activism, in which settler colonialism is a key issue. In developing an original theory of the phenomenon, MacNamee's thoughtful and clearly articulated study challenges certain common assumptions arising from racial and/or economic factors. These are neither necessary nor sufficient conditions for colonization and their relevance is sometimes skewed in ways that do not reflect historical trajectories. Moreover, racism can be a driver of both colonization and decolonization. Another point of emphasis is that the logic of state-sponsored colonization differs from that of colonization by private settlers whose interests are rarely identical and are too often conflated. A key finding is that certain aspects of modernization, found in economic/demographic trends, see potential settlers strongly attracted to urban centres where many more opportunities are available than in far-flung frontiers. This means that states seeking to populate and therefore secure peripheral areas with ‘loyal’ settlers, as distinct from potentially hostile border dwellers, often have difficulty in getting people to go there—and stay there. In the first case study, however, McNamee illustrates a successful effort in state-led settler colonialism in West Papua driven by the twin logics of counter-insurgency and resource extraction. After the Dutch were ousted in 1962, resistance to Indonesia's re-colonization by indigenous West Papuans saw heavy-handed security measures (resulting in many thousands of deaths) accompanied by an influx of immigrants under state-sponsored transmigration programs. Around 300,000 migrants were attracted by opportunities in the resource-rich territory, paving the way for later private settlers. This also represents a prime case of a country rhetorically committed to decolonization but which has engaged in one of the most violent colonizing exercises in the post-war period. Australia's Northern Territory case highlights the role of state security interests driven largely by ‘defence anxieties’. But the state failed to induce ‘loyal’ white settlers to move to a region providing too few attractions. In the same chapter, McNamee shows that Australia failed to ‘whiten’ Papua New Guinea, mainly because of huge challenges in establishing infrastructure to exploit resources. Australia was eventually faced with either incorporating Papua New Guinea within its federal system or preparing the pathway to independent sovereign statehood. Interestingly, many Papua New Guinean leaders preferred incorporation into Australia but were pushed to accept independence. The case of China shows two different outcomes in settling peripheries. From 1952 to 1972 China achieved much success in settling Xinjiang's northern border area with Russia—especially the oil-rich areas—with ‘loyal’ Han settlers, due at least partly to the state's capacity to coerce people to move. This capacity has been much diminished as capitalist marketization has changed the face of contemporary China. The more recent failure of state-sponsored settler colonialism in southern Xinjiang's Uyghur heartland, again driven primarily by security concerns, reflects a dearth of willing settlers even though there are resource-rich parts of the region. The final substantive chapter goes beyond the case studies to provide comparative data from around the world, showing that the above cases are not exceptional. The data also reinforce the point that internal settler colonialism in parts of the global South, subordinating or ‘cleansing’ numerous ethnic/indigenous minorities in the process, constitute the majority of current cases (notwithstanding the obvious fact that Australia, New Zealand, the US and Canada are major instances of settler societies). A key finding is the relative absence of the phenomenon in countries reaching a GDP per capita of $US6,000 by the late twentieth century. An exception to the general rule is the state of Israel. Despite a high level of capitalist development, it has consistently colonized and cleansed in the name of security—as illustrated only too clearly by the current war in Gaza. Western colonizers, however, eventually settled for less and abandoned their far-flung empires. On the basis of the findings throughout, the conclusion makes a case for decolonization, rather than colonization, as constituting the highest stage of capitalism. No doubt this is a provocative claim, but it is well backed up. Appendices for chapters 5 and 7 provide detailed explanations of data and methodology, enhancing the very through documentation throughout. Indeed, a major strength of the book is the attention to detail and provision of evidence-based findings—much of which is original—rather than generalized speculations driven by ideological commitments. It by no means offers any justification for colonialism but rather seeks to show many more nuances from a world historical perspective through which both Western and non-Western forms of the phenomenon are rigorously scrutinized. It is an excellent, highly accessible resource for scholars across a wide range of social science and humanities disciplines concerned with colonialism/postcolonialism/decolonialism.

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Prédiction distillée sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,000
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesaucune
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Sans objet · Signal consensuel: aucune
GenreSignal candidat: Empirique · Signal consensuel: aucune
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,849
Score d'incertitude au seuil0,880

Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0000,001
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0000,000
Bibliométrie0,0000,000
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0010,000
Communication savante0,0000,000
Science ouverte0,0000,000
Intégrité de la recherche0,0000,000
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0000,000

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,024
Tête enseignante GPT0,310
Écart entre enseignants0,286 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle