MétaCan
Menu
Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W4413273302 · doi:10.1093/sleep/zsag091.0683

0684 Treatment of Central Sleep Apnea in Adults: An American Academy of Sleep Medicine Clinical Practice Guideline

2025· article· en· W4413273302 sur OpenAlexaff
M. Safwan Badr, Rami Khayat, J. Shirine Allam, Suzanne Hyer, Matthew T. Naughton, Susheel P. Patil, Grace W. Pien, Winfried Randerath, Christine Won

Notice bibliographique

RevueSLEEP · 2025
Typearticle
Langueen
DomaineMedicine
ThématiqueObstructive Sleep Apnea Research
Établissements canadiensMcMaster UniversityImpact
Organismes subventionnairesUniversitätsspital ZürichAmerican Academy of Sleep MedicineWayne State University
Mots-clésMedicineGuidelineCentral sleep apneaSleep apneaSleep medicineSleep (system call)Clinical PracticePolysomnographySleep apnea syndromesApneaPhysical therapySleep disorderInternal medicinePsychiatryInsomniaPathology

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

INTRODUCTION: This guideline establishes clinical practice recommendations for treatment of central sleep apnea (CSA) syndromes in adults. METHODS: The American Academy of Sleep Medicine (AASM) commissioned a task force of experts in sleep medicine to develop recommendations and assign strengths based on a systematic review of the literature and an assessment of the evidence using the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation methodology. The task force provided a summary of the relevant literature and the certainty of evidence, the balance of benefits and harms, patient values and preferences, and resource use considerations that support the recommendations. The AASM Board of Directors approved the final recommendations. GOOD PRACTICE STATEMENT: The following good practice statement is based on expert consensus, and its implementation is necessary for the appropriate and effective management of patients with CSA. The optimal approach to CSA treatment should incorporate clinical features, comorbid conditions, and polysomnographic findings in an individualized manner. Specifically, clinicians must prioritize optimizing therapy for the conditions contributing to central apneas and improving patient-reported outcomes rather than solely focusing on eliminating disordered breathing events. Once therapy for CSA has been initiated, persistence of central respiratory events should prompt re-evaluation of the underlying risk factors and consideration of alternative treatment options. RECOMMENDATIONS: The following recommendations are intended as a guide for clinicians in choosing a specific treatment for adults with CSA. Each recommendation statement is assigned a strength ("Strong" or "Conditional"). A "Strong" recommendation (ie, "We recommend …") is one that clinicians should follow under most circumstances. A "Conditional" recommendation (ie, "We suggest …") is one that clinicians should offer to most patients if clinically appropriate. Some recommendations include remarks that provide additional context to guide clinicians with the implementation of this recommendation. 1. The AASM suggests using continuous positive airway pressure over no continuous positive airway pressure in adults with CSA due to the following etiologies: primary CSA, CSA due to heart failure, CSA due to medication or substance use, treatment-emergent CSA, and CSA due to a medical condition or disorder. (Conditional recommendation, low certainty of evidence). over no bilevel positive airway pressure with a backup rate in adults with CSA due to the following etiologies: primary CSA, CSA due to medication or substance use, treatment-emergent CSA, and CSA due to a medical condition or disorder. (Conditional recommendation, very low certainty of evidence). in adults with CSA due to the following etiologies: primary CSA, CSA due to heart failure, CSA due to medication or substance use, treatment-emergent CSA, and CSA due to a medical condition or disorder. (Conditional recommendation, very low certainty of evidence). 4. The AASM suggests using adaptive servo-ventilation over no adaptive servo-ventilation in adults with CSA due to the following etiologies: primary CSA, CSA due to heart failure, CSA due to medication or substance use, treatment-emergent CSA, and CSA due to a medical condition or disorder. (Conditional recommendation, low certainty of evidence). 5. The AASM suggests using low-flow oxygen over no low-flow oxygen in adults with CSA due to heart failure. (Conditional recommendation, low certainty of evidence). 6. The AASM suggests using low-flow oxygen over no low-flow oxygen in adults with CSA due to high altitude. (Conditional recommendation, very low certainty of evidence). 7. The AASM suggests using oral acetazolamide over no acetazolamide in adults with CSA due to the following etiologies: primary CSA, CSA due to heart failure, CSA due to medication or substance use, treatment-emergent CSA, and CSA due to a medical condition or disorder. (Conditional recommendation, low certainty of evidence). 8. The AASM suggests using oral acetazolamide over no acetazolamide in adults with CSA due to high altitude. (Conditional recommendation, very low certainty of evidence). 9. The AASM suggests using transvenous phrenic nerve stimulation over no transvenous phrenic nerve stimulation in adults with CSA due to the following etiologies: primary CSA and CSA due to heart failure. (Conditional recommendation, very low certainty of evidence). CITATION: 2025;21(12):2181-2191.

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier

Prédiction distillée sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,001
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,003
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesMéta-épidémiologie (sens strict)
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Observationnel · Signal consensuel: aucune
GenreSignal candidat: Empirique · Signal consensuel: Empirique
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,790
Score d'incertitude au seuil1,000

Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0010,003
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0020,000
Bibliométrie0,0010,002
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0000,001
Communication savante0,0000,000
Science ouverte0,0000,000
Intégrité de la recherche0,0000,001
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0000,000

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,037
Tête enseignante GPT0,436
Écart entre enseignants0,399 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle

Classification

machine, non validée

Prédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule tête enseignante, pas un consensus.

Devis d'étudeObservationnel
Domainenon disponible
GenreEmpirique

Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».

En bref

Citations18
Publié2025
Routes d'admission1
Résumé présentoui

Explorer davantage

Même revueSLEEPMême sujetObstructive Sleep Apnea ResearchTravaux en français237 207