The role of food as part of person-centred palliative care: An exploratory ethnographic study
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
Background: Palliative care is about more than providing high-quality medical care; it is about maximizing quality of life while dying. The role that food plays in palliative care is not well studied or understood. Most research on food in palliative care focuses on nutrition, rather than the importance of serving food that patients recognize, enjoy, and want to consume. This study aimed to understand the role of food as an integral part of person-centred palliative care. Methods: We engaged with patients, caregivers, staff, and hospital decision-makers at the Bruyère Health Palliative Care Unit in Ottawa, Canada. We focused discussions on the role and importance of food as part of palliative care, gaps regarding food in this setting, and how their needs could be better met. To collect data, we used rapid team-based ethnography, including 10 days of fieldwork in the Palliative Care Unit, informal conversations with patients, caregivers, and staff, observations of meals, and content analysis of food-related documents. Methods also included arts-based drawing techniques, semi-structured interviews with patients ( n = 4), caregivers ( n = 3), and hospital administrators and food services decision-makers ( n = 4), and self-reflexive journal entries by researchers. Data from all sources were triangulated, and Reflexive Thematic Analysis was used to inductively identify key themes. Results: The three overarching themes we found were: (1) the role of food changes for patients and caregivers as they progress through their palliative care journey, (2) there is a disconnect between the food services department and palliative care unit staff and patients, and (3) there is a need to have difficult conversations around the changing role of food with patients and caregivers and staff do not feel well-equipped to do this. Conclusion: To improve care, we first recommend addressing communication gaps by equipping palliative care providers with the skills they need to have difficult conversations about food. Secondly, we recommend that providers work closely with the food services department to ensure that they are aware of the unique needs of palliative care patients and help them identify areas where addressing unmet needs is aligned with quality improvement initiatives to accelerate change for patients and caregivers.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction distillée sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.
Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,000 | 0,002 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,000 | 0,001 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Communication savante | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Science ouverte | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule tête enseignante, pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».