Behavior Change Resources Used in Mobile App–Based Interventions Addressing Weight, Behavioral, and Metabolic Outcomes in Adults With Overweight and Obesity: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
Background: Overweight and obesity have become a public health issue. Lifestyle modifications delivered through mobile devices, especially mobile phones, present an opportunity to support weight loss efforts. However, evidence regarding the effects of mobile apps on other outcomes, such as blood pressure and physical activity (PA), remains limited. Recent studies on this topic require a systematic review and updating, and the active elements that promote behavior change remain unclear. Objective: The meta-analysis aimed to explore the effects of mobile phone apps on weight-related outcomes (weight, BMI, waist circumference [WC], fat mass, fat mass percentage), behavioral outcomes (moderate-to-vigorous physical activity [MVPA], energy intake), and metabolic outcomes (systolic blood pressure [SBP], diastolic blood pressure [DBP], triglycerides, hemoglobin A1c [HbA1c]) among adults with overweight and obesity. Behavior change techniques (BCTs), the smallest replicable intervention elements, were also identified to clarify the components used in current studies, along with associated resources, including facilitating, boosting, and nudging. In addition, factors influencing the effectiveness of these interventions were explored. Methods: Six databases (PubMed, Embase, CENTRAL, Web of Science, PsycINFO, and CINAHL) were searched for relevant randomized controlled trials (RCTs) published in English from inception to May 20, 2024. Two independent authors conducted study selection, data extraction, and quality assessment. The effect size of interventions was calculated using the mean difference (MD), and a random-effects model was applied for data analysis. Subgroup and sensitivity analyses were conducted to explore potential influencing factors and identify possible sources of heterogeneity. Results: A total of 29 studies were included. The results indicated that mobile phone app interventions significantly reduced weight (MD=-1.45 kg, 95% CI -2.01 to -0.89; P<.001), BMI (MD=-0.35 kg/m2, 95% CI -0.57 to -0.13; P=.002), WC (MD=-1.98 cm, 95% CI -3.42 to -0.55; P=.007), fat mass (MD=-1.32 kg, 95% CI -1.94 to -0.69; P<.001), DBP (MD=-1.76 mm Hg, 95% CI -3.47 to -0.04; P=.04), and HbA1c (MD=-0.13%, 95% CI -0.22 to -0.04; P=.005). However, nonsignificant effects were observed for other outcomes. The most frequently used BCTs included 2.3 "self-monitoring of behavior" (n=25), 4.1 "instruction on how to perform the behavior" (n=24), 2.2 "feedback on behavior" (n=20), 1.1 "goal setting (behavior)" (n=19), and 1.4 "action planning" (n=15). Fifty-nine percent of included studies used 3 resource types (ie, facilitating, boosting, and nudging). Subgroup analyses identified combined diet and PA interventions, medium-term intervention duration, and the use of ≥8 BCTs as potential reference interventions for improving outcomes. Conclusions: This meta-analysis demonstrates that mobile phone app interventions significantly reduce weight, BMI, WC, fat mass, DBP, and HbA1c in adults with overweight and obesity. However, future studies should explore ways to optimize app interventions by incorporating behavior change strategies and resources to further enhance their overall effectiveness.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction machine sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.
Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,018 | 0,047 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,003 | 0,002 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,022 | 0,030 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,010 | 0,010 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Communication savante | 0,003 | 0,002 |
| Science ouverte | 0,002 | 0,002 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,002 | 0,002 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,004 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».