MétaCan
Menu
Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W4413358684 · doi:10.5334/ijic.nacic24015

Advancing a Transitions in Care Guideline: Reflections on Strategies to Engage Staff

2025· article· en· W4413358684 sur OpenAlexaboutno aff
Dawn Schroeder, Ceara Cunningham, Staci Hastings, Jodi Cullum, Judy Seidel, Sara N. Davison

Notice bibliographique

RevueInternational Journal of Integrated Care · 2025
Typearticle
Langueen
DomaineHealth Professions
ThématiquePrimary Care and Health Outcomes
Établissements canadiensnon disponible
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésGuidelineIntegrated careNursingMedicineHealth carePsychologyMedical educationPolitical science

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

Background: Alberta Health Services (AHS) Primary Health Care Integration Network (PHCIN) led the development and implementation of the Home to Hospital to Home (H2H2H) Transitions Guideline over several years. Various enhanced operational practices are being trialed to improve patient care. In particular, H2H2H supported information organization and timely transfer of information between acute and primary care (PC), developed a patient discharge guide, and identified recommended practices for follow-up in primary care. PC has a significant role to play in improving transitions in care (TiC) practices to support patients transitioning from acute care back into the community.The ADAPT study was designed to support PC in enhancing their practices through the co-design and implementation of recommended practices from the H2H2H Guideline. ADAPT focuses on patient groups that are known to experience higher risks for adverse events when discharged from acute care (i.e., heart failure, COPD, cirrhosis, and end-stage kidney disease). ADAPT is applying implementation and improvement sciences approaches to guide the work to understand how PC providers and teams support patients as they transition from acute care back to their community, and to co-design practice changes that address gaps and/or challenges to enhance patient support. Additionally, ADAPT brings standardized evidence informed interventions to PC that can be tailored to the PC team context to support sustainable changes. Approach: Prior to enrolling PC teams into the ADAPT study, 7 interviews were conducted with PC providers and team members to understand current practices used from the time patients with medical complexities were admitted to acute care to the time they were followed up post-discharge. Results from these interviews indicated substantial variability in activities and resources dedicated to acute care follow-up activities, as well as timely and comprehensive information sharing between acute care and primary care.We are applying the Interactive Systems and Quality Implementation Frameworks to identify key steps within implementation phases and inform how roles within three interacting systems - synthesis and translation, support, and implementation delivery systems - interact. PC enrollment activities during the pre-implementation phase include: individual or group interview sessions to map out current TiC processes and co-design sessions with PC teams to identify gaps/challenges. New or modified practice changes developed within co-design sessions are drawn from evidence-based practices and adapted to local contexts or built from scratch. Improvement science approaches guide current state mapping exercises whereas the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research and Normalization Process Theory informs questions about factors within the co-design and monitoring phases that support or impede change. Results: Over 20 PC providers and their teams caring for urban, suburban, and rural patient populations are enrolled in the study. Although process mapping and co-design activities identified variability in resources to support TiC activities, improvements in education and monitoring of patients with medical complexities post-discharge is a common issue. This led to engagement with acute care partners to understand what type of education is reviewed with patients with one or more of the ADAPT focused conditions pre-discharge. We are working with PC participants and primary care network members to co-design practice changes that support continuity of education from acute care into the primary care space within urban and rural PC settings. Additionally, a change package was designed that includes a co-design and implementation guide for PC teams across the province to support TiC work. Implications: The adaptation and study of enhanced practice changes to fit to local contexts will provide PC teams within Alberta with practical steps to guide TiC work. This work also adds to the literature on evidence-based TiC processes for diverse communities and primary care practice teams.

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier

Prédiction machine sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,092
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,132
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesaucune
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Sans objet · Signal consensuel: Sans objet
GenreSignal candidat: Empirique · Signal consensuel: aucune
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,092
Score d'incertitude au seuil0,485

Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0920,132
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0020,001
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0010,003
Bibliométrie0,0020,003
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0130,010
Communication savante0,0150,018
Science ouverte0,0110,013
Intégrité de la recherche0,0260,047
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0080,003

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,035
Tête enseignante GPT0,485
Écart entre enseignants0,450 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle

Classification

machine, non validée

Prédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.

Les modèles n’ont appliqué aucune catégorie : rien dans la taxonomie ne correspondait à ce travail.
Devis d'étudeSans objet
Domainenon disponible
GenreEmpirique

Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».

En bref

Citations0
Publié2025
Routes d'admission1
Résumé présentoui

Explorer davantage

Même revueInternational Journal of Integrated CareMême sujetPrimary Care and Health OutcomesTravaux en français237 207