Offering Hyper-local Community Health and Information Fairs Through an Ontario Health Team to Provide Low-Barrier Access to Care.
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
Background: Pre-existing care gaps such as cancer screening, vaccines, chronic disease management, and access to health and community support services have been exacerbated during the pandemic in neighbourhoods that have health inequalities impacted by social determinants of health. We have developed an innovative, person and community-centered approach to increase access to health and care resources in equity-deserving neighbourhoods in North York, Ontario, Canada through Community Health and Information Fairs (CHIFs). Approach: North York Toronto Health Partners Ontario Health Team has worked collaboratively in partnership with local community health centers, the North York Family Health Team, community support services, community ambassadors, and physicians to organize and execute Community Health and Information Fairs (CHIFs) to increase community access to health and care resources, particularly for those without a dedicated primary care provider. The goal of the CHIFs is to improve community health by providing low-barrier access to care in equity-deserving neighbourhoods. Offerings at the CHIFs have been designed based on input from community partners and analysis of local health reporting data such as cancer screening rates and numbers of unattached patients. Community ambassadors, who are trusted and known members of the local community, have been trained in cancer screening guidelines and engaged to educate community members, encourage them to come to the CHIFs to access cancer screening tests and blood pressure/blood sugar checks, and help connect people to local community health centres and/or link them to Health Care Connect Ontario to gain access to a primary care provider. The CHIFs are held at times, in locations, and in ways guided by information from the community partners and ambassadors in order to provide culturally sensitive and informed care. Results: Over the past two years, we have held 20 CHIFs, completed 67 cancer screenings, 0 blood pressure readings, and blood glucose readings. At least 30% of the attendees reported not currently having a primary care provider. The multi-disciplinary CHIFs have provided unattached and equity-deserving patients access to primary care providers offering cancer preventive education and screening (cervical, breast and colorectal), health promotion and prevention education, and referrals to community support services and agencies including mental health services. On-the-spot blood pressure and blood sugar checks have supported individuals with their risk of illness and helped them to navigate the appropriate health providers or community resources needed to manage their chronic diseases and address other health requirements. Implications: By leveraging existing community resources, collaborating with local partners organizations, and partnering with community ambassadors, we have been able to support the preventative care and chronic disease management needs of equity-deserving people experiencing barriers to accessing primary care through the innovative person and community-centered strategy of organizing CHIFs. Community ambassadors in particular have been crucial to the success of this endeavour by providing insight into the specific needs and interests of local communities, as well as building trust, engagement, and mobilizing local support for the CHIFs.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction machine sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.
Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,002 | 0,003 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,000 | 0,001 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,007 | 0,001 |
| Communication savante | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Science ouverte | 0,001 | 0,004 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,059 | 0,003 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».