Essential Care Partner Programs: A Strategy to Advance Integrated Care through the Inclusion of Caregivers
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
Caregivers play an essential role in patient care and bridge silos in the health care system but are often not included as partners in care. This workshop will highlight the Ontario Caregiver Organization Essential Care Partner Support Hub - a first-of-its-kind initiative working to transform the culture of care through the spread of practices that embed caregivers as a key component of integrated care. Why conduct a workshop? Caregivers provide an estimated 75% of care for individuals of all ages, significantly easing the burden on the healthcare system. However, despite their essential contributions, caregivers are frequently underrecognized within care teams. This workshop will address the importance of caregivers as partners in care as an essential feature of integrated care. Audience: This workshop will be of interest to a wide range of health care professionals (point-of-care, leaders, and managers), patients, caregivers, and policy makers. The content will be particularly relevant to those involved in patient/family experience, quality improvement, integrated and team-based care models or patient/family advisory committees. Approach: This workshop will be led and facilitated by two members of the OCO staff team (Lisa Salapatek, Executive Lead of Strategic Partnerships and Innovation and Alison Kilbourn, Manager of the Essential Care Partner Support Hub) and Brina Ludwig-Prout, caregiver and Co-Chair of the Essential Care Partner Advisory Committee. Outline (90 minutes) Introduction, Overview of the Essential Care Partner Support Hub (5 mins) How caregivers are critical: real life experience (0 mins - Brina sharing her experience expertise) Evidence Insights: (5 min ) Why caregivers are essential to person-centred care and positive health outcomes Why a focus on caregivers is critical to the goal of integrated care Essential Care Partner Programs Leading/Emerging Practices: (0 min) Strategies to identify, include and support caregivers at point of care Building blocks for Essential Care Partner Program implementation Interactive table discussions (25 min) and report-back (5 min), co-facilitated by presenters What policies and practices have you seen (or been involved in) to identify, include and support caregivers in health care delivery? What are the barriers or challenges to identifying, including and supporting caregivers as part of the integrated care team? Essential Care Partner Programs in Action: (5 min) Highlight practical tools and resources Case examples promising practices from integrated care teams in Ontario (Ontario Health Teams, integrated primary care teams) Interactive reflections: (0 min) Based on what you heard today, how can we better identify, include and support caregivers? Closing thoughts How will you engage with the audience? The workshop will include a presentation followed by facilitated discussion. Participants will engage in small group discussions based on two key questions, sharing their perspectives and ideas. Afterward, each group will report back to the larger audience. This approach will foster active participation and collaborative problem-solving among attendees. How are you going to summarize the take home messages? Caregivers play an essential role in patient health outcomes, quality of care, safety and patient care experience. Caregivers are the thread that links together all parts of the health care system: however, are often not recognized and empowered to participate as part of the care team. The Essential Care Partner Support Hub is a first-of-its-kind initiative working to transform the culture of care by accelerating the spread of practices that embed caregivers as a key component of integrated care. Practical, proven tools are available to support the implementation of Essential Care Partner programs that are designed to identify, include and support caregivers in care delivery. The journey to a more connected, inclusive and integrated and team-based health care system needs to recognize caregivers as partners in care.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction machine sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.
Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,024 | 0,018 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,008 | 0,004 |
| Communication savante | 0,009 | 0,015 |
| Science ouverte | 0,004 | 0,037 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,007 | 0,013 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,036 | 0,008 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».