Workshop: Relational Care and Community-building: principles and strategies to support workforce capacity and capability
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
Background: Strong trusting relationships between care recipients, care practitioners, community partners, and the formal and informal sectors of care are at the heart of integrated care. How can bringing a more relational lens to integrated care core competencies enhance the capacity and capability for a more satisfied, flexible, and resilient workforce? This experiential workshop aims to grow our understanding of the concept of relational care in different contexts, taking its cues from the learnings of UHN NORC Innovation Centre focused on healthy aging in place.The NORC Innovation Centre (NIC), uses a relationship-centred, participatory approach to create sustainable, resident-led, aging in place groups in Naturally Occurring Retirement Communities (NORC). Having a high concentration of older adults, NORCs are ideal settings for mobilizing communities, developing supportive networks, and organizing health and wellness programming.Early evaluation of the NIC community-based model for aging in place identified a need for greater capacity in community-building skills among resident groups. Leveraging the evidenced-based practice of relational care, the NIC team embedded the transformative principles of building meaningful relationships and dealing with complex dynamics into their process of community-building. Our research findings suggest that resident-leaders reported improved ability to communicate, make decisions together, and agree on shared values and goals. By centring a relational approach, the program set a tone for NIC staff, residents, and community providers to get to know each other, build rapport, and set a tone of trust, safety and inclusion. Audience: This workshop is relevant for all levels of individuals working with diverse stakeholder groups on health and care change efforts. Individuals working in administrative, managerial, frontline and voluntary capacities can all benefit, particularly those most interested in how to accelerate efforts to support complex and sustainable change. Approach: This 90-minute workshop will alternate between small group activities and large group discussion. Through a series of discussion-based and creative reflections, we will engage with three of the main tenets of relational care and community-building: i) creating connection before finding solution; ii) staying curious with humility; and iii) understanding that we are all teachers and learners. Together, we will learn from each other lived experiences, identify emerging needs/questions, and refine strategies for practical application of relational care.At each step, NIC team members will share our learnings about the practice of leading with relational principles to support healthy aging. The workshop will end with a group discussion on best relational practices and a review of strategies for ongoing practical application. The format and timing of the 90-minute workshop is as follows: Introductory PowerPoint presentation to set the context: 0 min. Relational Principle # case example and small group exploration activity: 20 min [Relational principle case example: 5 min; small group work: 5 min]Relational Principle #2 case example and small group exploration activity: 20 min [Relational principle case example: 5 min; small group work: 5 min] Relational Principle #3 case example and small group exploration activity: 20 min [Relational principle case example: 5 min; small group work: 5 min] Large group feedback on practice and closing takeaway: 20 min. Outcome: By the end of the workshop, participants will come away with a deeper understanding of what relational care is and the ways a relational approach can enhance individual and team capacity when, for example, advocating for patients, engaging with volunteers and community partners, or working with interdisciplinary teams. Participants will have co-created a set of tips on best practices for leading with relational principles. This tangible takeaway will be available for their immediate use.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction machine sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.
Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,010 | 0,009 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,000 | 0,001 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,007 | 0,006 |
| Communication savante | 0,006 | 0,005 |
| Science ouverte | 0,004 | 0,017 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,005 | 0,007 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,020 | 0,003 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».