Advancing Sustainable Development in Bahrain through the Triangulation Approach
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
1. Introduction The Imperative Call for Sustainability. Government attempts for sustainability in all its jurisdictions have been given utmost significance in the recent years due to the manifest necessity to safeguard various forms of resources for the future stakeholders and to provide a route for development and growth that is rooted in the premise of positive conservation, protection, and continuity. These endeavors for sustainable development were put forward in a methodical process due to the creation of several frameworks for sustainability, deliberate interventions of international organizations, collaboration of various worldwide alliances, and bolstering support systems in various nations. The significance of sustainable development is succinctly presented in its typical definition that is grounded on the concept to pursue a type of development that “meets the needs of the present without compromising the ability of future generations to meet their own needs” (World Commission on Environment and Development, para 1, 1987). Inherent in this conceptualization is the primacy of resource perpetuity to the next generation of stakeholders in a particular nation. The ramifications of social processes such as those related to commerce, trade, public governance, education, scientific innovation, and sociocultural processes are considered in the framework of sustainable development, which makes this advocacy an important pillar in all human activities. Given the aforesaid importance of sustainability, it is easy to identify sustainable development efforts around the world. In North America, the “Federal Sustainable Development Strategy (FSDS) puts the Government of Canada's environmental priorities squarely within the broader context of social and economic priorities. The environment has an equal footing with the social and economic pillars of sustainable development” (Public Works and Government Services of Canada, p. v. 2010). Most of these efforts in sustainable development have been significantly accomplished and realized in larger economies. For example, “Germany, the United Kingdom and France have all managed to reduce their emissions over a 40-year period while their economies have continued to grow… Germany has reduced total emissions by 22 percent, France by 20 percent and the UK 18 percent” (Brown, sec 3, 2013). This is supported by the concerted efforts of the European Union (EU). The Eurostat European Commission reports that the “EU sustainable development strategy, launched by the European Council in Gothenburg in 2001 and renewed in June 2006, aims for the continuous improvement of quality of life for current and future generations”.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction machine sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.
Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,031 | 0,024 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,006 | 0,011 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,009 | 0,012 |
| Communication savante | 0,009 | 0,007 |
| Science ouverte | 0,003 | 0,011 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,002 | 0,002 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,009 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».