MétaCan
Menu
Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W4413366062 · doi:10.5334/ijic.nacic24071

Exploration of pharmacist integration into a community-based approach for complex vulnerable patients

2025· article· en· W4413366062 sur OpenAlexaboutno aff
Doris Nessim, Kathy A. Pfaff, Michelle Howard, Deborah Sattler, Merrick Zwarenstein

Notice bibliographique

RevueInternational Journal of Integrated Care · 2025
Typearticle
Langueen
DomainePharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutics
ThématiquePharmacy and Medical Practices
Établissements canadiensnon disponible
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésPharmacistIntegrated careNursingMedicineProcess managementHealth careBusinessPharmacyPolitical science

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

Exploration of pharmacist integration into a community-based approach for complex vulnerable patients with the Windsor-Essex Compassion Care Community (WECCC)Authors:Doris Nessim, Kathy Pfaff, Michelle Howard, Deborah Sattler, Merrick Zwarenstein, Lisa Dolovich (presenter) BACKGROUND: Globally, health systems are challenged with managing the increasing lifespans and vulnerabilities associated with aging and accompanying chronic diseases, which are often managed with numerous complex medication therapies. The World Health Organization (WHO) recommends integrated person-centered health services (IPCHS) to address health system fragmentation. Compassion care communities (CCC) are an example of IPCHS and are increasing in momentum across Canada.The Windsor-Essex Compassion Care Community (WECCC) is an example of an IPCHS, mobilizing health and social care entities, volunteers, and community agencies in addressing the universal needs of aging, although lacks a focus on medication management for patients with chronic health conditions who are often on several medications.There is an opportunity to optimize the quality of life and care for community-dwelling older adults through exploring the barriers, facilitators and strategies for integrating pharmacists within integrated health care systems such as WECCC. APPROACH: Research Advisory Council (RAC) was created at the start of the research, providing consultation throughout it and consisted of representatives with WECCC, pharmacy, healthcare, and the community.Exploratory qualitative research was conducted. A purposeful sample of 5 participants was recruited consisting of 7 pharmacists in varying practice settings, 3 other healthcare providers (a nurse, nurse practitioner, and WECCC coordinator), 2 community administrators, and 3 WECCC clients. Data were collected using a semi-structured questionnaire and in-depth phone interviews and analysed using inductive thematic analysis of the transcribed data set.Interview questions drew on four scenarios modeled after WECCC clients experiences regarding a: () care transition for an elderly community-dwelling patient; (2) new palliative care diagnosis for an elderly person prescribed new therapy; (3) nurse-referral to a community-based pharmacist for a patient needing chronic pain management; and (4) secluded patient with limited finances to access his prescriptions. RESULTS: Three predominant themes emerged: () comprehension and enacting integrated care (2) effective and timely decision making to medication therapies, and (3) structured and well-functioning healthcare system. The themes are consistent with the WHO IPCHS strategies and align with several of the nine pillars of integrated care of the International Foundation for Integrated Care (IFIC). Participants recognized pharmacists expertise with improving the quality of patient care in each scenario. Barriers, facilitators, and strategies were identified in areas of building relationships, workforce capacity, improving access to resources and digital solutions, care coordination and operational processes, pharmacy curricula and enablers through reimbursement and establishing new alliances such as the concept of a most responsible designated pharmacist role. While clarity to this role evolves, a key component is being a connector to patients between care transitions. IMPLICATIONS: There is an opportunity to optimize the quality of life and care for community-dwelling older adults, and to improve health system-wide structure, processes and governance though integrating pharmacists with the integrated health system and the integrated care team. Further awareness of the IPCHS concepts and integrated care pillars would be helpful across all health disciplines including pharmacists. Pharmacy and community health stakeholders will be engaged in discussions to identify future research opportunities, and practice and policy actions.

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier

Prédiction distillée sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,001
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesaucune
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Expérimental (laboratoire) · Signal consensuel: aucune
GenreSignal candidat: Empirique · Signal consensuel: aucune
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,602
Score d'incertitude au seuil0,673

Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0010,001
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0000,000
Bibliométrie0,0000,000
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0000,000
Communication savante0,0000,001
Science ouverte0,0010,000
Intégrité de la recherche0,0000,002
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0000,000

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,235
Tête enseignante GPT0,507
Écart entre enseignants0,272 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle

Classification

machine, non validée

Prédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule tête enseignante, pas un consensus.

Les modèles n’ont appliqué aucune catégorie : rien dans la taxonomie ne correspondait à ce travail.
Devis d'étudeExpérimental (laboratoire)
Domainenon disponible
GenreEmpirique

Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».

En bref

Citations0
Publié2025
Routes d'admission1
Résumé présentoui

Explorer davantage

Même revueInternational Journal of Integrated CareMême sujetPharmacy and Medical PracticesTravaux en français237 207