MétaCan
Menu
Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W4413368052 · doi:10.3389/ijph.2025.1608480

A Custom Keyword Tool for Improving the Quality of Social Media Monitoring on Vaccine Safety: A Proof of Concept

2025· article· en· W4413368052 sur OpenAlexaffabout
Lucie M. Bucci, Smaragda Lamprianou, Francesco Gesualdo, Shanthi Pal

Notice bibliographique

RevueInternational Journal of Public Health · 2025
Typearticle
Langueen
DomaineSocial Sciences
ThématiqueMisinformation and Its Impacts
Établissements canadiensAlberta Health Services
Organismes subventionnairesWorld Health Organization
Mots-clésProof of conceptPublic healthSocial mediaQuality (philosophy)Computer scienceEnvironmental healthMedicineRisk analysis (engineering)Internet privacyWorld Wide WebNursing

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

Social media monitoring is one of several ways for health authorities to capture specific insights into population perceptions about vaccine safety (1). Commercial and open-source tools are helpful for gathering data on socio-cultural, religious, and political trends, but also for detecting what is being said about vaccine safety and why populations are delaying or refusing vaccination (2). Monitoring and tracking digital forums for target audiences and influencers and identifying misinformation provides additional understanding. However, despite the clear need, public health authorities globally are severely constrained in their capacity to effectively address the overwhelming volume and complexity of misinformation (3). To complicate matters, international, national, and corporate infodemic management policies are imposing information users to change the way they share information online and on social media platforms. Recent examples of how information users are adapting include the use of memes and increasing the amount and speed of information disseminated between platforms. This rapid evolution of misinformation tactics and limited public health resources including insufficient staffing, and a lack of specialized digital capacity within many public health authorities, renders comprehensive oversight incredibly challenging. As digital information environments become more complex, existing tools for social media monitoring need to adapt to meet the needs of public health authorities that may not have the resources to undertake comprehensive social media listening (4). For health authorities to truly benefit from better quality social media intelligence, innovations must be developed that are not only required but also accessible, adaptable and feasible to implement (5).The Vaccine Safety Net (VSN), the World Health Organization's (WHO) global network that facilitates access to trustworthy, science-based vaccine safety information, identified this challenge as an opportunity to contribute to a rapidly expanding area. The VSN consists of member websites seek to achieve more effective ways for communicating through digital and social media analytics research (6). The latter involves identifying high impact vaccine safety related issues on social media for predicting and pre-bunking misinformation, developing and testing social media messages, as well as assessing their relevance and impact using a commercial platform with a social listening tool. Leveraging the VSN's expertise in social medial listening, we developed and tested a custom keyword filter designed for adaptable global implementation by public health authorities. This filter aims to address the significant challenge posed by the sheer volume and evolving nature of misinformation, which often overwhelm existing commercial and online generic filters and their ability to provide precise results. For example, many generic keyword filters rely on estimations and are capable of over-filtering (or under-filtering) valuable social media content and fail to capture relevant information. Social media content is highly contextual and generic keyword filters do not interpret the nuances of language (e.g., comedy, sarcasm, anger, etc.)We sought to understand how to optimize social media searches on vaccine safety using a custom keyword filter for better quality search results. A proof-of-concept project whereby a custom keyword filter was designed using Kim et al.'s (7) conceptual framework and tested using a commercial social listening platform and open source artificial intelligence (AI) tools with the intent of analyzing the quantity of irrelevant relevant mentions retrieved from vaccine safety searches on X® in Canada, United States, Italy and United Kingdom.Unfiltered keywords can yield large amount of irrelevant data (8). Therefore, custom keyword filters are meaningful methods for improving digital and social media monitoring practices in response to constantly evolving information environments. For additional accuracy, we chose to first create and test a keyword filter with vaccine -related keywords. A vaccine safety keyword filter was subsequently created and tested to distill the information. We added artificial intelligence (AI) derived keywords to the filter, which expanded the social media datasets.The custom keyword filter involves three steps: 1) frequency screening; 2) sampling; and 3) search implementation.A list of candidate vaccine and vaccine safety keywords were pooled in collaboration with VSN members from Canada, Italy, United States and United Kingdom. Candidate keywords were selected considering native language of targeted countries, media reports, published literature and epidemiological events. The list of candidate keywords was applied to a six (6) month retrospective scan of X® conversations between January and June 2023 using a commercial social media monitoring platform. We tracked keywords that peaked on X® and developed a history of trending candidate keywords for this period. We used this dataset to identify the frequency of candidate keywords. Candidate keywords that had less than 30% of mentions per month were discarded from the keyword list. This frequency threshold was selected through team consensus for this proof of concept. This initial triage was used to identify vaccine and vaccine safety keywords used more regularly in X® conversations.A data analyst was enlisted to assist with AI keyword identification. Additional vaccine and vaccine safety-related keywords were extracted from the original dataset using Bidirectional Encoder Representations from Transformers (BERT) and Generative Pre-trained Transformer 3 (GPT-3).The remaining candidate keywords were then screened for relevance. To do this, a real time dataset of X® keyword mentions of up to one (1) week was generated. We sampled two hundred (200) mentions for each candidate keyword, including reposts using a commercial sample operator. Three team members, experts in vaccination and vaccine safety, reviewed each sample to determine relevance.We assessed the relevance of keywords by classifying their sensitivity and specificity to "vaccine-related" and then "vaccine safety-related" words. Keywords were considered relevant if they were used in the context of vaccination conversations or was implicit in meaning.Keywords that returned no relevance were removed from the list but added to a 'negative keyword list' for prospective Boolean searches. Duplicate posts within each keyword dataset were also removed. Other content in posts such as emojis, hashtags and usernames were not considered relevant.Links to websites, if included in posts, were used to clarify context of post. Replies were also excluded.Lastly, common words known as "stop-words' (e.g., the, she, he, it, are, etc.) were excluded.Keywords determined to be highly relevant were not used in a new prospective search on X® to evaluate the quality of their search results. This final step was not part of the scope of this proof of concept.Thirty (30) vaccine and vaccine safety-related keywords were extracted for each country (see figures 1 and 2) using manual and AI methods. Vaccine-related keywords were used in three thousand one hundred and seventy-eight (3178) posts. While vaccine safety-related keywords were used in eighthundred and sixty-nine (869) posts (see table 1). Bert and GPT identified additional keywords including combined terms not previously identified. Themes extracted and analysed from vaccine safety-related mentions include public skepticism about vaccine safety, particularly COVID-19 vaccines, polarization between vaccination perspectives, concerns about misinformation, mistrust in government, influencers, and pharmaceutical companies.Our objective was to develop a custom keyword filter for producing better quality social media intelligence for public health authorities to easily use and be versatile in their vaccine safety communication strategies. We found the development of a custom keyword filter that uses both manual and AI as methods for extracting social media mentions and performing content analysis about vaccine and vaccine safety-related posts yielded quality data. The strategy for our proof-of-concept study used a commercial platform for testing and keyword refinement. We anticipate that custom keyword filters may be used with other commercial and freely available keyword filters for more precise results. This is an advantage over using commercial or online filters alone. That said, keyword filter refinement is a timeconsuming process as well as data analysis and interpretation. Despite these shortcomings, social media monitoring innovations are needed to keep with changing information environments. While we did not test the keyword filter for sensitivity, we found the filter to meet our expectations for specificity. New tools need to focus on improving the relevance of outputs. AI offers other avenues for filtering candidate keywords but we are still learning about its limitations. Our proof-of-concept project contributes to a rapidly evolving area and provides new insights on how public health can use adaptable keyword filter tools, in addition to commercial tools, to improve their capacity to respond to online misinformation.

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier

Prédiction machine sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,010
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,011
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesaucune
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Simulation ou modélisation · Signal consensuel: aucune
GenreSignal candidat: Méthodes · Signal consensuel: Méthodes
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,015
Score d'incertitude au seuil0,051

Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0100,011
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0020,001
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0010,001
Bibliométrie0,0020,001
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0010,001
Communication savante0,0020,003
Science ouverte0,0030,003
Intégrité de la recherche0,0030,002
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0150,006

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,108
Tête enseignante GPT0,451
Écart entre enseignants0,342 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle

Classification

machine, non validée

Prédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.

Les modèles n’ont appliqué aucune catégorie : rien dans la taxonomie ne correspondait à ce travail.
Devis d'étudeSimulation ou modélisation
Domainenon disponible
GenreMéthodes

Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».

En bref

Citations0
Publié2025
Routes d'admission2
Résumé présentoui

Explorer davantage

Même revueInternational Journal of Public HealthMême sujetMisinformation and Its ImpactsTravaux en français237 207