MétaCan
Menu
Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W4413370999 · doi:10.33137/cpoj.v8i1.45517

EXPLORING THE CORRELATION BETWEEN GAIT SPEED AND BALANCE IN LIMB PROSTHESIS USERS: A PILOT STUDY

2025· article· en· W4413370999 sur OpenAlexvenueaboutno aff
Abdullah Alhuzaymi, Goeran Fiedler

Notice bibliographique

RevueCanadian Prosthetics & Orthotics Journal · 2025
Typearticle
Langueen
DomaineEngineering
ThématiqueProsthetics and Rehabilitation Robotics
Établissements canadiensnon disponible
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésBalance (ability)Rank correlationPhysical medicine and rehabilitationGaitAmputationPhysical therapyPreferred walking speedCorrelationPearson product-moment correlation coefficientPopulationProsthesisSpearman's rank correlation coefficientConfoundingOutlierMedicineStatisticsMathematicsSurgery

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

BACKGROUND: Increasing balance and stability, along with efficient locomotion, is a high-priority goal of physical rehabilitation after limb loss in order to facilitate effective participation in society. Research in the general population suggests that the ability to walk fast is correlated to good performance in balance tests. However, it is unclear if and how prosthesis use influences this correlation. OBJECTIVE: Our small-sample pilot study aimed to explore whether the general relationship between walking speed and balance holds true for people with limb loss whose physical capabilities are inevitably influenced by their prosthetic devices. METHODOLOGY: Participants with any level of limb loss were recruited and asked to perform the Ten-Meter Walk Test and Narrowing Beam Walking Test. Scores in both tests were analyzed using Spearman’s rank correlation coefficient. FINDINGS: The initial sample of eleven participants was reduced to eight (5 males, 3 females, mean age 52 years, mean height 171 cm, mean weight 68 kg, mean BMI 23, limb loss levels ranging from partial hand to trans-femoral amputation) after removing outliers. The mean Ten-Meter Walking velocity was 1.16 m/s, and the mean Narrowing Beam Test score was 11.38. The results indicate a medium to strong correlation between fast walking speed and high balance scores (ρ = 0.681, p = 0.063) when outliers are excluded. CONCLUSION: These findings are consistent with prior research conducted in other populations. However, outliers in our data suggest that this relationship is not universal across all individuals with limb loss. Possible confounding variables include the activity level and the respectively prescribed prosthetic technology. Our finding, that gait speed and balance scores should be evaluated separately to tailor rehabilitation strategies effectively, is preliminary and needs to be confirmed in a larger study. Layman's Abstract Losing a limb can have a major impact on a person’s daily life, including their ability to stay active, feel confident, and avoid accidents like falling. One of the main goals of physical rehabilitation after limb loss is to help people regain balance and stability, so they can move around safely and take part in everyday activities. We know from research on the general population that people who walk faster also tend to have better balance. But it is unclear if this same connection applies to people who use prosthetic limbs, since their walking ability is affected by both their physical condition and the type of prosthesis they use. This pilot study explored how walking speed relates to balance in eleven people with limb loss (8 men, 3 women), of whom three were eventually excluded from the final analysis. Participants completed two tests: a 10-meter walk to measure speed and a narrowing beam test to assess balance. We found that faster walkers generally had better balance scores, with some exceptions that might be due to the challenges of using prostheses. These early findings suggest that both walking speed and balance should be considered separately when designing prosthetic care to improve stability and reduce fall risk. Larger studies are needed to confirm these results, as this was a small feasibility study to test procedures and gather initial data. Article PDF Link: https://jps.library.utoronto.ca/index.php/cpoj/article/view/45517/34223 How To Cite: Alhuzaymi A, Fiedler G. Exploring the correlation between gait speed and balance in limb prosthesis users: A pilot study. Canadian Prosthetics & Orthotics Journal. 2025; Volume 8, Issue 1, No. 8. DOI:10.33137/cpoj.v8i1.45517 Corresponding Author: Goeran Fiedler, PhDAffiliation: Department of Rehabilitation Science and Technology, University of Pittsburgh, USA.E-Mail: gfiedler@pitt.eduORCID ID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1532-1248

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier

Prédiction distillée sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,001
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesaucune
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Observationnel · Signal consensuel: Observationnel
GenreSignal candidat: Empirique · Signal consensuel: Empirique
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,032
Score d'incertitude au seuil0,813

Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0010,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0000,000
Bibliométrie0,0010,001
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0000,000
Communication savante0,0000,000
Science ouverte0,0000,000
Intégrité de la recherche0,0000,001
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0000,000

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,039
Tête enseignante GPT0,233
Écart entre enseignants0,194 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle

Classification

machine, non validée

Prédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule tête enseignante, pas un consensus.

Les modèles n’ont appliqué aucune catégorie : rien dans la taxonomie ne correspondait à ce travail.
Devis d'étudeObservationnel
Domainenon disponible
GenreEmpirique

Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».

En bref

Citations1
Publié2025
Routes d'admission2
Résumé présentoui

Explorer davantage

Même revueCanadian Prosthetics & Orthotics JournalMême sujetProsthetics and Rehabilitation RoboticsTravaux en français237 207