MétaCan
Menu
Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W4413427553 · doi:10.4103/jiad.jiad_19_25

North South Dialogues on Inclusive Education: A Move Away from Colonialism

2025· article· en· W4413427553 sur OpenAlexaboutno aff
Varsha Hooja

Notice bibliographique

RevueThe Journal of Inclusion and Disability – Research Neuro Rehabilitation and Empowerment · 2025
Typearticle
Langueen
DomaineSocial Sciences
ThématiqueAfrican cultural and philosophical studies
Établissements canadiensnon disponible
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésColonialismPolitical scienceHistoryArchaeology

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

BACKGROUND ADAPT, previously known as The Spastics Society of India, has played a pivotal role in the advancement of disability services in India, guided by the visionary leadership of Founder President, Dr. Mithu Alur. After over 25 years of focusing on special education, the organization pivoted toward inclusive education, a change informed by Dr. Alur’s doctoral research, “Invisible Children: A Study of Policy Exclusion” (Alur, 1999) which highlighted the exclusion of children with disabilities (CWD) from essential services such as education and health care in India. To further the cause of inclusive education, the National Resource Centre for Inclusion India (NRCI) was established in collaboration with Canada’s Roeher Institute and supported by the Canadian International Development Agency (CIDA). The center aimed to advocate for social and economic reforms in India through a human rights lens. Inclusive education promotes diverse learning needs, extending beyond only CWD to all who face barriers to learning. Nonetheless, many policymakers still reference Western models as an inspiration (Kalyanpur, 1994; Alur, 1998; Miles, 1995). It is important to dismantle these lingering colonial legacies and empower nations to cultivate indigenous models of inclusive education. THE NORTH-SOUTH DIALOGUES The North-South Dialogs (NSDs) on inclusive education, conceptualized and initiated by Dr. Alur, comprised four international conferences, held in India, aimed at presenting cost-effective inclusive education models from Southern nations while discussing culturally relevant inclusion frameworks. The intent of the dialogs was to amplify the diverse voices of individuals from both economically developed and developing nations in an accessible and nonesoteric manner. Delegates from 26 nations (Australia, Bangladesh, Brazil, Cambodia, Canada, Chile, China, Denmark, Egypt, Germany, Hong Kong, India, Indonesia, Ireland, Mongolia, Nepal, Norway, Pakistan, Portugal, Russia, South Africa, and Tajikistan), alongside representatives from influential organizations such as the World Bank, UNESCO, UNICEF, CIDA, the Government of India, and various civil society organizations, participated to share insights on diverse cultural contexts, resources, and policies for inclusive education. NORTH-SOUTH DIALOGUE I ON INCLUSIVE EDUCATION, 2001, MUMBAI The inaugural dialogue focused on identifying culturally relevant models of inclusive education. Representatives from various nations discussed the multidimensional nature of inclusion concerning policy, human rights, and community participation, aligning with the NRCI mission to enhance awareness surrounding inclusion while fostering community participation in the process. Recommendations There was a consensus that inclusive education ought to be an intrinsic component of the broader campaign to achieve education for all (EFA) The Education Bill should explicitly include provisions for CWD The term “Education for All” should have a positive statement clarifying that “all” encompasses CWD To promote a cohesive approach to EFA, educational policies should be consolidated within the Ministry of Education rather than being relegated to the Ministry of Welfare. As a consequence of the inaugural NSD, an All India Regional Alliance for Inclusive Education was established. NORTH-SOUTH DIALOGUE II ON INCLUSIVE EDUCATION, 2003, KOCHI: FROM RHETORIC TO REALITY The second dialogue aimed to shift inclusive education from rhetoric to action, focusing on practical implementation challenges. It sought to analyse various policy-making processes with attendance from professionals, government officials, and nongovernmental organizations (NGOs). The discussions highlighted existing barriers to inclusive education despite commitments made through initiatives like the Dakar Framework and Salamanca Statement. The dialog attracted participation from prominent professionals and representatives from both Northern and Southern countries, as well as government officials at both State and Central levels, NGOs, activists, and other stakeholders engaged in educational services. The conference aimed to emphasize how the ideology and philosophy underlying political commitments could be realized through transformative change at three levels: Micro-level, pertaining to classroom and school values, cultures, policies, and practices Mezzo-level, involving community engagement and involvement Macro-level, addressing policy development, legislative frameworks, and the political culture at local, state, national, and global levels. One of the significant objectives of Dialog II was to document the identified issues and incorporate them into a code of practice that was being developed by the NRCI, referred to as Culturally Appropriate Policy and Practice (CAPP). THE KOCHI DECLARATION, KERALA 2003 The outcomes of the conference, including the recommendations from the dialog, the accompanying policy statement, and the plan of action necessary to operationalize policy, were consolidated into a document known as the Kochi Declaration, Kerala 2003. This declaration was unanimously endorsed by the 170 delegates in attendance, emphasizing that all developmental initiatives must be “disability sensitive.” NORTH-SOUTH DIALOGUE III ON INCLUSIVE EDUCATION, 2005, NEW DELHI: TOWARDS A GLOBAL ALLIANCE The third iteration of the NSD centred on promoting inclusive educational environments. The dialogue’s focus was also on advocacy strategies to foster the inclusion of marginalized groups, particularly individuals with disabilities and their families. The dialog sought to foster collaboration with key national and international decision-makers, aiming to enhance the international alliance and support localized campaigns aimed at eliminating the exclusion of specific groups from educational settings. The target audience encompassed individuals with disabilities, alongside marginalized youth and adults, their families, practitioners, academics, government representatives, and like-minded allies committed to promoting inclusive practices. It was affi that individuals with disabilities, their families, and other segregated groups must take an active role in advocating for inclusive education. Objectives To initiate the CAPP framework for inclusive education, facilitated by the National Resource Centre on Inclusion – India To establish a global alliance for inclusive education To highlight effective advocacy initiatives and methodologies for inclusive education at both national and global levels. NORTH-SOUTH DIALOGUE IV ON INCLUSIVE EDUCATION, 2012, GOA: IMPLEMENTING TOOLS OF CHANGE FOR INCLUSION The fourth chapter of the NSD aimed to consolidate and share experiences and insights. It specifically addressed the challenges faced by developing countries in their eff to include CWD and other marginalized groups, who are excluded from educational institutions due to systemic barriers. The discourse encompassed these concerns under the umbrella of “Tools of Change,” showcasing various intervention models from countries such as Nepal, Tajikistan, Sri Lanka, Bangladesh, Cambodia, Indonesia, Mongolia, and Vietnam, as well as sharing pertinent experiences from developed nations. The conference also celebrated 40 years of ADAPT’s contributions to the fi of disability and recognized a decade of partnership with the Women’s Council, UK, for the Community Initiatives in Inclusion course, which has successfully trained over 350 participants from 22 countries (Bangladesh, Bhutan, Cambodia, China, Indonesia, Iraq, Jordan, Kenya, Kyrgyzstan, Malaysia, Maldives, Mongolia, Myanmar, Nepal, Pakistan, Papua-new Guinea, Sri Lanka, Tajikistan, Government of Tibet in Exile, Tonga, Vietnam, and India). Outcomes: Publications “Inclusive Education: Proceedings of NSD I,” edited by Dr. Mithu Alur and Professor Tony Booth, published by UBS publishers and distributors, New Delhi, 2005 “Inclusive Education: From Rhetoric to Reality, The North-South Dialogue II,” edited by Dr. Mithu Alur and Dr. Michael Bach, published by Viva Publications, New Delhi, 2005 “The Journey for Inclusive Education in the Indian Sub-Continent,” by Dr. Mithu Alur and Dr. Michael Bach, published by Routledge, New York, USA, 2009 “Inclusive Education Across Cultures: Crossing Boundaries, Sharing Ideas,” co-edited by Dr. Mithu Alur and Vianne Timmons, published by Sage, 2009 Three volumes of resource material CAPP, were also published. CONCLUSION The NSDs played a crucial role in moving the conversation on inclusive education beyond theoretical commitments to practical applications, emphasizing the need for locally relevant solutions. By bringing together diverse international stakeholders, these dialogues fostered collaboration, shared learning, and actionable frameworks that address the unique needs of CWD and other marginalized groups. They dismantled colonial legacies by empowering countries to develop and adopt indigenous models of inclusive education that resonate with their cultural contexts. The success of these dialogues underscores the importance of continued collaboration in shaping inclusive educational practices, emphasizing that achieving equity in education is a shared global responsibility. Financial support and sponsorship Nil. Conflicts of interest There are no conflicts of interest.

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier

Prédiction machine sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,025
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,012
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesaucune
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Sans objet · Signal consensuel: aucune
GenreSignal candidat: Empirique · Signal consensuel: aucune
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,035
Score d'incertitude au seuil0,130

Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0250,012
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0010,001
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0010,001
Bibliométrie0,0020,002
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0350,043
Communication savante0,0150,016
Science ouverte0,0020,034
Intégrité de la recherche0,0070,022
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0060,001

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,046
Tête enseignante GPT0,396
Écart entre enseignants0,350 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle

Classification

machine, non validée

Prédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.

Les modèles n’ont appliqué aucune catégorie : rien dans la taxonomie ne correspondait à ce travail.
Devis d'étudeSans objet
Domainenon disponible
GenreEmpirique

Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».

En bref

Citations0
Publié2025
Routes d'admission1
Résumé présentoui

Explorer davantage

Même revueThe Journal of Inclusion and Disability – Research Neuro Rehabilitation and EmpowermentMême sujetAfrican cultural and philosophical studiesTravaux en français237 207