Web-Based Delivery of an Effective Church-Based Intervention Program to Promote Cancer Screening (Community-based Health litEracy-focused intervention for breast and cervical Cancer Control) Among Korean Immigrant Women in the United States: Randomized Controlled Trial
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
Background: Women with limited English proficiency continue experiencing an unequal cancer burden. Non-White immigrant women present with more advanced breast and cervical cancer than non-Hispanic Whites, attributed to significant cultural barriers as well as low health literacy in attempting to navigate the United States health care system for cancer screening. Community-based Health litEracy-focused intervention for breast and cervical Cancer Control (CHECC-uP) was an in-person, community health worker-led intervention, addressing both cultural and health literacy barriers through health literacy education and follow-up counseling with navigation assistance. The in-person program was tested in a large cluster-randomized trial and yielded high efficacy in promoting mammogram and Papanicolaou test screening in Korean-speaking women. With over 90% of Americans now having online access, the in-person program was adapted to web-based delivery. Objective: This study aimed to evaluate the feasibility, acceptability, and preliminary efficacy of the web version of the intervention-e-CHECC-uP. Methods: A randomized pilot trial was conducted. A total of 40 women were enrolled and randomized (20 per arm). The study intervention consisted of web-based health literacy education followed by phone counseling with navigation assistance. Study assessments were done at baseline, 3 months, and 6 months. The study's primary outcomes were cancer screening behaviors verified by medical record review. Upon completion of final study assessments, intervention participants were invited to join postintervention interviews. Results: In total, 34 women (intervention: n=15; control: n=19) completed the assessment at 6 months, yielding a retention rate of 85%. The intervention participants were highly satisfied with e-CHECC-uP with a median rating of 8 on a 10-point scale. Between-group differences in screening rates were 34.6%, 47.9%, and 37.5%, respectively, for completion of the mammogram, Papanicolaou test, and both at 6 months. Conclusions: We achieved a high retention rate and high participant satisfaction. Although the study was not powered for significance testing, the e-CHECC-uP intervention resulted in large group differences across all cancer screening outcomes in the pilot sample. Online technology can help address multiple logistical barriers associated with in-person intervention delivery. Our findings suggest that web-based delivery of CHECC-uP may be used to promote cancer screening among immigrant women with limited English proficiency, as a promising avenue to ultimately reduce health disparities in underserved communities.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction machine sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.
Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,003 | 0,004 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,003 | 0,002 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Communication savante | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Science ouverte | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,002 | 0,002 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,011 | 0,001 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».