Transforming multi-stakeholder engagement towards coproduction of optimized maternal, newborn, and child health and a resilient community health system in rural Ethiopia: A qualitative study
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
INTRODUCTION: In Ethiopia, Maternal, Newborn, and Child Health (MNCH) outcomes have been improving, however, the current level of Maternal and under-five children mortality remains the highest in the world. Despite the rhetoric around the significance of multi-stakeholder engagement as a buzzword in development theories and polices to improve health and other development outcomes, there is limited evidence on how multi-stakeholders intersect and mutually reinforce each other toward the coproduction of improved MNCH outcomes and a resilient community health system. The aim of this manuscript is to examine barriers to and facilitators of coproduction in the context of multi-stakeholder engagement to optimize MNCH outcomes and a resilient community health system in rural Ethiopia. METHODS: We conducted a qualitative case study in West Shewa Zone, rural Ethiopia. A purposive sampling technique was used to recruit participants. Data sources were two focus groups discussions with CHWs, twelve key informant interviews with multilevel public health policy actors, and a policy document review related to the CHW program to triangulate the finding. Thematic analysis of the qualitative data was conducted. Our study was informed by multiple theoretical frameworks including the World Health Organization's building block framework, state- society synergy model to inform the research processes and analysis. RESULTS: In the context of multi-stakeholder approach, our analysis revealed the multilevel barriers to and facilitators of coproduction in the community health landscape in rural Ethiopia. The major barriers of coproduction include lack of vertical and horizontal alignment, lack of continuum of and sustainable engagement practice,lack of systemic coordination platforms, and Inadequate coordination and implementation capacity. Major facilitators of coproduction include embedded integrated community health system, promising macro-level multi-stakeholder and community-level engagement and coproduction aspects. CONCLUSIONS: Our study reveals mixed policy and practice-related results, the current multi-stakeholder engagement is necessary but insufficient and fragmented to coproduce optimized MNCH outcomes and ensure a resilient health system in rural Ethiopia. Moving beyond the current multi-stakeholder engagement as a buzzword in health polices to practice through, embracing meaningful coproduction frameworks is fundamental while building on multi-stakeholder engagement efforts to optimize MNCH outcomes and a resilient community health system. A coproduction framework leverages the intersection and mutual reinforcement of multi-stakeholder synergy throughout the CHWs' program cycle through shared power and joint assessment, planning, implementing, decision making and evaluating. Fostering effective multi-stakeholder engagement synergy requires balanced shared power, alignment to community priorities, systemic mapping, coordination and monitoring, and continuum and sustainability of engagement strategies. Beyond donor initiatives and a dependency approach, proactive health diplomacy strategies are also important to sustain the existing and attract new actors to realize sustainable positive health outcomes and a resilient community health policy and strategy.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction machine sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.
Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,015 | 0,009 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,011 | 0,007 |
| Communication savante | 0,004 | 0,003 |
| Science ouverte | 0,001 | 0,005 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,001 | 0,002 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,002 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».