Insights into associations between oral and general health outcomes of nursing home residents based on interRAI data: a cross-sectional study (Preprint)
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
Background: Oral health of nursing home residents is generally poor, largely due to age-related conditions that increase their vulnerability and make them more dependent on others for oral care. Poor oral health can significantly impact general health and well-being, highlighting the important role of caregivers in preventing, detecting, and addressing residents' oral health problems in time. The interRAI Suite of instruments, widely used for comprehensive health assessments, offers the opportunity for nondental caregivers to assess oral health as part of general health and well-being and facilitates the integration of oral health in general care planning. Objective: Based on interRAI data, this study explored the associations between oral health and general health outcomes of nursing home residents in Flanders (Belgium) and the Netherlands. Methods: This cross-sectional study included baseline interRAI assessments of 2362 Flemish and Dutch residents aged 65 years and older, collected by caregivers (eg, nurses, nurse aids) between October 2020 and February 2024. Validated outcome scales (eg, Activities of Daily Living Hierarchy Scale, Cognitive Performance Scale, and Depression Rating Scale), health conditions such as diabetes and low weight (BMI ≤19), and family support and participation in social activities, included in the interRAI instrument, provided information on residents' general health and well-being. Oral health was defined according to the 9 items of the optimized Oral Health Screener (OHS) for use in the interRAI instruments. Adjusted logistic regression models were used to explore the associations between oral and general health outcomes. Results: Oral health problems were interconnected, with conditions in one oral structure impacting the health of others. When controlling for confounding variables, dependency on others for personal care and hygiene was significantly associated with poor oral hygiene (odds ratio [OR] 1.7, 95% CI 1.1-2.4), chewing difficulties (OR 2.2, 95% CI 1.3-3.5), compromised teeth (OR 1.7, 95% CI 1.1-2.5), and the need for dental referral (OR 1.8, 95% CI 1.4-2.3). Natural dentition and gender had a significant impact on oral health status. Low weight was associated with poor chewing function (OR 2.0, 95% CI 1.1-3.6) and dry mouth (OR 1.8, 95% CI 1.0-3.2), both associated with oral discomfort or pain (OR 6.8, 95% CI 3.3-14.0 and OR 3.5, 95% CI 1.8-6.9, respectively). Family support was identified as a facilitator in mitigating oral health problems. Conclusions: The interRAI instrument, including the OHS, is a valuable tool for monitoring residents' health and identifying areas requiring additional support. The results demonstrated the importance of prioritizing oral health as an integral component of comprehensive care. Recognizing the interconnection between oral health and other health conditions, including indicators of well-being, can guide caregivers and other health care professionals in incorporating preventive and supportive oral care practices into daily care routines, contributing to improved resident health and well-being outcomes.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction distillée sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.
Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Communication savante | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Science ouverte | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule tête enseignante, pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».