Digital Health Literacy and Its Role in Awareness of and Access to Sexual Health Products and Services Among Displaced Youth in Uganda’s Informal Urban Settlements: Community-Based Cross-Sectional Study
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
BACKGROUND: Digital health interventions can enhance sexual health equity among marginalized and underserved populations, including displaced youth. However, there is limited understanding of displaced youth's digital health literacy (DHL) and its association with knowledge of and access to sexual health products and services. OBJECTIVE: This study aims to identify patterns of DHL among displaced youth and assess how these patterns are associated with awareness of and access to sexual health products and services, while considering gender differences. METHODS: We conducted a cross-sectional tablet-assisted survey in Kampala, Uganda. We used peer-driven sampling to recruit displaced youth aged 16-24 years living in 5 informal urban settlements. We identified DHL patterns using latent profile analysis. Gender-disaggregated multivariate probit models were constructed to estimate the relationship between DHL and awareness of and access to sexual health products and services (eg, sexual and reproductive health [SRH] information, external condoms, condom use training, sexually transmitted infection testing, and HIV testing). RESULTS: Among the participants (N=445), our latent profile analysis identified 4-DHL classes named: low (class 1, 51/444, 11.5%), moderate (class 2, 99/444, 22.2%), high (class 3, 138/444, 31%), and very high (class 4, 157/444, 35.3%). Our adjusted multivariate probit model indicated that, compared to class 1, class 4 participants were more likely to know where to access condom use training (marginal effect [ME]=0.23; P<.001), external condoms (ME=0.19; P<.001), and HIV testing (ME=0.23; P<.001). We also noted gender-based differences. Men with very high DHL, compared with those with low DHL, were more likely to know where to access SRH information (ME=0.46; P<.001) and condom use training (ME=0.40; P<.050), while women with very high DHL were more likely than those with low DHL to report knowing how to access condom use training (ME=0.12, SE=0.06; P<.050), external condoms (ME=0.34; P<.001), and HIV testing (ME=0.22, SE=0.10; P<.050). Regarding access to sexual health products and services in the last 3 months, class 4 respondents reported higher access to condom use training (ME=0.13, SE=0.04; P<.001), external condoms (ME=0.14; P<.050), and HIV testing (ME=0.24; P<.050) than class 1 respondents. Gender differences showed that among men, those with very high DHL were more likely to access condom use training (ME=0.28; P<.010) than those with low DHL. In contrast, among women, those with very high DHL were less likely to access SRH information (ME=-0.20; P<.001). CONCLUSIONS: Our findings reveal a generally high level of DHL but suboptimal awareness of and access to SRH services among urban displaced youth in Kampala. Improving SRH among urban displaced populations will require gender-responsive and culturally grounded digital sexual health interventions to increase awareness of and access to sexual health products and services.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction machine sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.
Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,001 | 0,003 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,001 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,000 | 0,001 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Communication savante | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Science ouverte | 0,001 | 0,002 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,002 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».