Niigaaniiwin
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
In 2018, we were awarded a one-year Tri-Council development grant that provided the needed resources and time to work together with community as we developed an application for a larger Indigenous health operating grant. In June 2019, a group of academics, community partners/researchers, and health professionals gathered to create a vision for a community- based health research network. Understanding the importance of community voices and authentic participation, our team hosted a gathering for community members interested in Indigenous health and seeing this proposed health research network become a reality in northern Ontario. As we prepared for our journey towards community-driven research, we asked community gathering participants to add their expertise, voice, and vision to these objectives: Build upon Indigenous health research that is led by communities through funding, connecting, and/or supporting community-based and community-partnered health research. Honour our Indigenous ways of knowing and being so that Indigenous health researchers, students, and organizations can do their work in a good way and feel safe doing so. Support community-based researchers and graduate students with learning opportunities and connect them to mentors. Share knowledge and be able to give back to communities in a way that reflects their needs and not the needs of the college/university. This visioning process brought forth a holistic image of structure, Elders as data keepers, land, language, relationships, youth involvement, the protection of Indigenous knowledges, land-based education, researcher training, addressing power imbalances, mentorship, community involvement, university connections, shifting perspectives, reciprocal sharing, data governance, Indigenous data sovereignty, sharing with respect, directory of experts, and importance of identity. These were all identified by community participants as areas that are important when working within Indigenous health research. Upon the initial announcement of unsuccessful funding, we found ourselves as a network with a responsibility to continue working within community and to further develop the seeds of this Indigenous health network. With the continued guidance of Elders H. Neil Monague and Mary Elliott, we refocused and have brought forth our Indigenous health collective: Niigaaniiwin. This grassroots collective is community-based with support from the academic community. We have gathered the knowledge, wisdom, and stories from the community and are moving forward, hoping to live up to the name gifted to our collective, which means “leading the way.”
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction distillée sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.
Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,003 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,007 | 0,000 |
| Communication savante | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Science ouverte | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule tête enseignante, pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».