Early Identification of Individual Nursery Pigs at Risk of Requiring Health Treatment Using Machine Learning
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
Infectious disease is a major concern in the swine industry, impacting production as well as animal welfare. In this research, a prediction model for early identification of late nursery pigs within a batch that are at higher risk of requiring health treatments in a dynamic disease environment was developed based on early daily data on feeding and drinking and body weight. For this purpose, a unique dataset was used consisting of 21 batches of up to 75 late nursery pigs that were entered into a natural polymicrobial disease challenge barn to develop and evaluate the prediction models. The model was designed to predict the probability of a pig requiring at least one health treatment between 14 and 27 days following exposure to the disease challenge based on daily feeding, drinking, and body weight data collected on the pig and the batch from days 6 to 14 after exposure. Four tree-based machine-learning models and an ensemble model were used to develop the prediction models using the leave-one-batch-out approach for training and validation. The prediction results were further used to rank pigs within a batch on the predicted probability of requiring treatment. All models were evaluated in terms of area under the curve (AUC), accuracy, and Pearson correlation between predictions and observed outcomes (treated or not). In general, all models had a limited ability to predict the number of pigs that required at least one treatment for a new batch because of the dynamic nature of the disease challenge between batches and the use of batch-level medications and other interventions. However, all models had some ability to rank pigs based on the probability of requiring treatment and these probabilities were generally positively correlated with outcomes (treated or not treated between day 14 and 27 after exposure) within a batch, although these correlations were highly variable between batches, ranging from -0.13 to +0.48, and averaged around 0.22. All models had similar prediction performance, although Random Forest generally had the highest performance. In general, we conclude that early daily data on feeding, drinking, and body weight has some ability to identify nursery pigs within a batch that are at higher risk of requiring health treatments but data on additional features or human observations will be needed to improve early identification of such pigs. Finally, drinking data provided slightly more information than feeding data.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction machine sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.
Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,002 | 0,003 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Communication savante | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Science ouverte | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,001 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».