Notice bibliographique
Résumé
Interactive platforms have fundamentally reshaped how users engage with moving images, not only transforming narrative possibilities but also reconfiguring the epistemic status of the image itself. More than a narrative device or a set of technological affordances, interactivity operates as a vector for the reconstruction of the real—what can be known, how it is felt, and who participates in its becoming. The growing prominence of interactive works that engage with real-world conditions, rather than fictional or speculative realms, signals a significant shift: interactivity is increasingly used not to escape from the real but to recompose it. This raises a pressing question: why does interactivity appear better suited to engage with reality than to invent imaginary worlds? This article situates interactivity not merely as a mode of storytelling, but as a philosophical and political gesture—a means of reworlding the real. In doing so, it reclaims interactivity as a critical method of research-creation, one that prioritizes process over product, relation over representation, and sensation over simulation. Through a close engagement with Couchot’s theories and a broader analysis of affect, agency, and embodied cognition, the text explores how interactive practices challenge dominant regimes of knowing, opening new territories for speculative, sensory, and situated modes of engagement. The arguments developed in this article are grounded in the analysis of thirty-three research-creation projects presented at the Interactive Film and Media (#IFM) conferences between 2021 and 2025. These projects span a wide range of media forms—including web-based platforms (EXPOSED, Receipts), immersive VR environments (Affiorare, Firgrove Reimagined), augmented reality and geolocated works (AR Cité, Monument Public Address System AR), experimental games (Scapegoat), hybrid installations (The Circle Project, Somos Mulheres), and poetic or glitch aesthetics (Lucid Assemblage, The New Virtuality). They address urgent themes such as incarceration and justice, gender and queer identity, mourning and grief, ecological degradation, Indigenous epistemologies, and ritualized embodiment. Rather than focusing on singular case studies, the article maps broader patterns across the corpus to determine emergent tendencies in how interactivity is mobilized in contemporary creative practice. Particular attention is paid to how specific mediums structure user engagement, what forms of knowing and sensing they privilege, and how they contribute to rethinking agency, authorship, and the construction of the real. By surveying this constellation of projects, the article aims to elucidate how research-creation today positions media not merely as vessels of representation, but as engines of speculative, participatory world-making.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction distillée sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.
Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,001 | 0,002 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Communication savante | 0,000 | 0,001 |
| Science ouverte | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,000 | 0,001 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule tête enseignante, pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».