Notice bibliographique
Résumé
“Howlround” is British slang for the screeching sound of a feedback loop, where one sound is echoed and amplified through a system until it becomes uncontrollable. This paper takes up the metaphor of resonances and feedback loops to interrogate the interactive systems of Korean artist team Loopntale (Youngju Kim & Hoyoun Cho). Based in Seoul, a megacity that has famously embraced smart city technology, the duo utilizes interactive storytelling and video to engage audiences with non-human urban perspectives, including animals and machines. Resonance occurs when two elements share a frequency, and therefore amplify and strengthen each other based on similarity. This functions as a lovely metaphor for social solidarities and collective action that emphasize agreement, and when applied towards creative practices might be considered under the framework of relational aesthetics. Curator Nicholas Bourriaud coined the term in 1998 to describe artworks that take up social relationality and contexts as a creative material, yet the idea has been famously critiqued by art critic Claire Bishop, who points out that his idea of social relationships is too easy. Antagonism, she argues, is crucial to democratic participation, which requires resonances but also dissonance to properly represent a plurality of viewpoints. For Bishop, merely participating (interacting) in a relational exchange is not enough—the encounter must also the quality of the meaning production that takes place. Therefore, a rich encounter must include both resonance and dissonance. While Loopntale use the medium of video games—a media that is often associated with play and pleasure—their interaction design often relies on challenging mechanics that disrupt the player’s ability to smoothly interact with the artwork. For instance, Code and Cartography (2022) requires players to navigate a series of spaces built around non-human perspectives that disrupt human senses of direction, while Layers of Reality: The Cat (2018/2023) symbiotically links the player character and a companion animal as they strive to evacuate an urban disaster. Other works like Ro (2023) feeds player movements and interactions into an AI story generating system that then populates new narratives that feed back into the system, and Manipulating the World (2020) similarly highlights fragmented narrative and unstable truths by using smartphones to stage local multiplayer interactions. This paper hypothesizes that the artists use glitched and disrupted perspectives to create critical and self-reflexive gameplay dynamics (See: Menkman). These tools highlight both the resonances and dissonances of the topics that they explore, including non-human perspectives in urban environments, and the fragmented ways that human storytelling shapes the world around us. The writing will position their work as an important intervention into the homogenized urban spaces that are created by economically driven development and the technocratic urban technologies of the smart city (See: Lindner), using a methodology of close analysis on a selection of case-studies from the artists body of work, alongside interviews with the Loopntale team to understand their thinking and material practice more deeply.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction distillée sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.
Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,000 | 0,001 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Communication savante | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Science ouverte | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,001 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule tête enseignante, pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».