Development of a family-centered intervention to support self-determination in adolescents and young adults with intellectual disability in home environments: Protocol for a multistage mixed methods design
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
qualitative study involving semi-structured interviews and observations with families of young children with disabilities to examine how the home environment influenced the strategies they used to support their children's self-determination.The authors identified several strategies used by these families, such as encouraging children to choose what they want to eat, creating spaces for play and interaction with others, supporting independent movement around the house, teaching goal achievement during play with toys, and providing opportunities for children to control their personal space and privacy [19,22].Another notable gap identified in Dean et al.'s [31] review was the scarcity of interventions focused on family support and self-determination, with only three studies reporting such interventions.The scarcity of interventions, specifically in Spain, was also highlighted in a previous study by Arellano and Peralta [18] that examined Spanish parents' attitudes towards young children with intellectual disability. Study purpose and research questionsThis paper reports the protocol for a multistage mixed methods study.In order to address the gaps in the body of research discussed above, the purpose of this mixed methods study is to determine how self-determination develops and is supported in home environments in adolescents and young adults with intellectual disability and a mild or moderate level of support, with the aim of developing an intervention to promote self-determination in these environments.The study is based on a family-centered approach, thus considering the family as a unit of intervention and as the key factor in implementing the study.This approach relies on collaboration between families and professionals to achieve the design of the intervention.We aim to answer the following research questions:Research question 1: How do families of adolescents and young adults with intellectual disability support the self-determination of these individuals in their home environments in Spain?Research question 2: What context-sensitive strategies and practical actions are identified by professionals, adolescents and young adults with intellectual disability, and their families as relevant and feasible to support the self-determination of adolescents and young adults with this disability in home environments in Spain?Research question 3: What are the main elements of a desirable context-sensitive intervention to support the self-determination of adolescents and young adults with intellectual disability in their home environments in Spain?Research question 4: What strategies should be used to implement this intervention?
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction machine sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.
Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,026 | 0,016 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,002 | 0,002 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,003 | 0,003 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,002 | 0,001 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,003 | 0,002 |
| Communication savante | 0,001 | 0,002 |
| Science ouverte | 0,003 | 0,004 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,003 | 0,004 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,019 | 0,003 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».