What Is Clinical Empathy in Anesthesiology? Perspectives From Practicing Anesthesiologists
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
BACKGROUND: To train and encourage providers to be more empathic, it is crucial to first understand what behaviors providers consider acts of empathy in clinical practice. Research has asked this important question of patients and certain physician specialties, but has left out a unique physician population-anesthesiologists. Given the link between patients' preoperative anxiety and poorer postoperative outcomes, anesthesiologists' ability to address patients' needs effectively, particularly during shorter interactions with new patients, may impact patient outcomes. The purpose of the current research was to investigate what anesthesiologists consider to be empathic behaviors and to compare these results with past investigations of other physician specialties. METHODS: Practicing anesthesiologists (N = 99) were recruited online to rate 49 physician behaviors on a 0 to 10 scale for the degree to which each behavior was aligned with their own conceptualization of clinical empathy. RESULTS: Three components of empathic behaviors emerged: Conscientious and Reassuring, Relationship Oriented, and Emotionally Involved. In line with past work with other physician specialties, anesthesiologists rated Relationship-Oriented behaviors as those most closely related and Conscientious and Reassuring behaviors as least closely related to what they viewed as empathy. Although not statistically significantly, men anesthesiologists were more likely to view Conscientious and Reassuring behaviors as aligned with their conceptualizations of empathy than women anesthesiologists, and women anesthesiologists were significantly more likely to view Emotionally Involved behaviors as aligned with their conceptualizations of empathy than men anesthesiologists, with medium effect sizes. CONCLUSIONS: Although anesthesiologists interact with patients during some of the most emotionally charged and vulnerable situations when evaluating, monitoring, and supervising patient care, beginning preoperatively and continuing through their postoperative care, they do not view empathy behaviors fundamentally differently than other physician specialties. We discuss how these results can inform medical education communication and relational approaches by capitalizing on the understanding of anesthesiologists' conceptualizations of empathy.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction distillée sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.
Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,002 | 0,022 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Communication savante | 0,000 | 0,001 |
| Science ouverte | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,000 | 0,001 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule tête enseignante, pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».