Analyzing Reddit Social Media Content in the United States Related to H5N1: Sentiment and Topic Modeling Study
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
BACKGROUND: The H5N1 avian influenza A virus represents a serious threat to both animal and human health, with the potential to escalate into a global pandemic. Effective monitoring of social media during H5N1 avian influenza outbreaks could potentially offer critical insights to guide public health strategies. Social media platforms like Reddit, with their diverse and region-specific communities, provide a rich source of data that can reveal collective attitudes, concerns, and behavioral trends in real time. OBJECTIVE: This study aims to analyze Reddit comments from state-specific subreddits in the United States from the most recent outbreak period of 2022 to 2024 to (1) assess the sentiments expressed as the H5N1 outbreak progresses; (2) identify predominant topics discussed, particularly those corresponding to negative sentiments; and (3) explore correlations between these sentiments or topics and the severity and spread of the outbreak in respective regions. METHODS: We collected 2152 Reddit comments from 160 subreddits across 11 highly impacted states from February 2022 to July 2024. Outbreak data comprising almost 600 entries were obtained from the US Department of Agriculture database. Sentiment classification was performed using a fine-tuned Bidirectional Encoder Representations From Transformers (BERT) base model, and comments were categorized into 6 emotions: anger, fear, joy, love, sadness, and surprise, with a seventh "neutral" category added for low-confidence classifications. Topic modeling was conducted using BERTopic and latent Dirichlet allocation models. Statistical analyses included calculating correlations between sentiment intensity and outbreak severity levels and applying the Mann-Whitney U test to assess differences between sentiment categories. RESULTS: The findings illustrate that H5N1 unfolded in mostly discrete national waves and that only a subset of states-Minnesota and Iowa-experienced chronic, multiwave exposure, a pattern obscured in national aggregates. Sentiment intensity scoring revealed that although 90% (n=1931) of discourse was negative, emotions differed in how they tracked the epidemic: fear aligned weekly with real-time case counts (r=0.11), whereas anger, sadness, and even joy surged 3 weeks after the outbreak (r=0.20-0.24 after the lag was considered). When both the 3-week lag and an outlier month in terms of outbreak cases were adjusted for simultaneously, those associations strengthened further (overall r=0.223), showing how delayed reactions and anomalous surges can mask true sentiment-epidemiology links if left uncorrected. This defines the window in which risk communicators can pre-empt misinformation and economic anxiety. Topic modeling uncovered recurring themes of concern: avian flu culling, sharp egg-price hikes, and frustration over prolonged biosecurity measures. BERTopic provided more coherent and locally specific topics than latent Dirichlet allocation. CONCLUSIONS: Overall, these results underscore the critical role of social media analysis in understanding public reactions, including prevalent themes and sentiments, and guiding timely, targeted public health interventions during the H5N1 outbreak.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction machine sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.
Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,001 | 0,004 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,000 | 0,001 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,002 | 0,001 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Communication savante | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Science ouverte | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,001 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».