MétaCan
Menu
Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W4414094682 · doi:10.4103/sbvj.sbvj_44_25

The Indispensable Role of Nurses in War Scenarios

2025· article· en· W4414094682 sur OpenAlexaboutno aff
S Parthasarathy

Notice bibliographique

RevueSBV Journal of Basic Clinical and Applied Health Science · 2025
Typearticle
Langueen
DomaineHealth Professions
ThématiqueHealth and Conflict Studies
Établissements canadiensnon disponible
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésBattlefieldContext (archaeology)PillarHealth careSpanish Civil WarNursing care

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

Nurses are unsung heroes who exemplify the qualities of bravery, compassion, and resiliency in the midst of war, where chaos reigns and uncertainty is the only constant. Their presence in military conflicts is an essential pillar that maintains the health and well-being of both combatants and civilians, not just an auxiliary support system.[1] It becomes evident that nurses’ contributions are priceless and worthy of acknowledgment when we consider their historical and current significance in war situations. HISTORY The role of nurses in war has changed enormously historically. From the time of Florence Nightingale at the start of the Crimean War, when she revolutionized the practice of nursing and sanitary conditions, to the contemporary battlefield medics, nurses have continuously dedicated themselves to nursing in a war context.[2] The profession has responded to hazardous circumstances while working in makeshift hospitals or trenches in a war zone, competing with fighter aircraft in a theatre of war, and exposing themselves to hostile fire and combat to administer care. Their commitment amidst dangerous circumstances is a testament to their character and professional career. PROVIDING CARE IN AN EMERGENCY CONTEXT In war, the most urgent care is often warranted. In war, nurses and medics are usually the first responders who deliver emergency or critical care in the chaos of combat situations. Nurses are trained and able to initiate life-saving procedures, treat injuries, and manage trauma. The speed of providing critical care and the precision of assessing the injury can determine the outcome of life or death, especially when time is a critical issue. In addition, nurses particularly have a tendency to provide both medical treatment and emotional feedback and reassurance in their moments of desperation. Nurses Respond to the Needs of Civilians: “Nurses do not limit their efforts to the battlefield; they also tend to care for affected civilians.” They provide primary health services including maternal and child health services; vaccinations against communicable diseases; and treatment for epidemics. Nurses in refugee camps and war zones enable the prevention of outbreaks, relieve suffering, and advocate for the health rights of marginalized populations. Nurses Support Resilience and Hope: Nurses do not just provide clinical care, but their role is to support the resilience and hope of people affected by war. Listening to and engaging with patients allows nurses to build healing, not just physically but emotionally. In a land filled with trauma and loss, nurses create an opportunity for healing.[3] Nurses exemplify what humanity looks like, reminding us that compassion exists, even in the most devastating experiences. REAL LIFE EXAMPLES Mary Seacole who built a hotel for injured soldiers during the Crimean War and gave them essential care and comfort in spite of racial discrimination. Major Margaret Clothilde MacDonald, RRC (February 26, 1873–September 7, 1948), was a pioneering Canadian military nurse who served in both the Second Boer War and World War I. As Matron-in-Chief of the Canadian Army Medical Corps Nursing Service, she became the first woman promoted to the rank of major in the British Empire. Awarded the Royal Red Cross in 1916 and the Florence Nightingale Medal in 1918, MacDonald significantly advanced military nursing standards and opened doors for women in the military. She retired in 1920, leaving a lasting legacy. CONCLUSION While we acknowledge the significant role that nurses play in war settings, we need to recognize and invest in their education, training, support, and provision. They are vital to the military and civilian healthcare system and are worthy of gratitude and respect. As we move forward, the ongoing commitment of these nurses to provide care when violence and chaos persist is a glimmer of hope for all, and is representative of the lasting impact compassion can provide during the world’s worst times. In celebrating these healthcare professionals, we recognize the important contribution of nursing in building health, dignity, and resilience in the aftermath of conflict.

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier

Prédiction machine sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,004
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,019
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesaucune
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Sans objet · Signal consensuel: Sans objet
GenreSignal candidat: Empirique · Signal consensuel: aucune
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,012
Score d'incertitude au seuil0,042

Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0040,019
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0010,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0000,000
Bibliométrie0,0010,000
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0070,007
Communication savante0,0060,009
Science ouverte0,0010,011
Intégrité de la recherche0,0050,008
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0120,006

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,081
Tête enseignante GPT0,506
Écart entre enseignants0,425 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle

Classification

machine, non validée

Prédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.

Les modèles n’ont appliqué aucune catégorie : rien dans la taxonomie ne correspondait à ce travail.
Devis d'étudeSans objet
Domainenon disponible
GenreEmpirique

Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».

En bref

Citations0
Publié2025
Routes d'admission1
Résumé présentoui

Explorer davantage

Même revueSBV Journal of Basic Clinical and Applied Health ScienceMême sujetHealth and Conflict StudiesTravaux en français237 207