Neurodevelopmental Consequences of Antenatal Exposure to Antipsychotic Medication: A Systematic Review
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
Introduction Antipsychotic (AP) medications are increasingly prescribed, with indications ranging from psychotic illness to mood disorders. Many patients and clinicians are concerned about long-term consequences of drug exposure in the neurodevelopmentally critical prenatal window. Yet maternal mental illness itself is also associated with significant changes to the prenatal environment. Objectives To systematically review the literature on the short- and long-term behavioral, socioemotional, psychomotor, and neurocognitive outcomes in children prenatally exposed to AP medication. Methods We included original studies assessing cognitive, motor, behavioral, social, and psychiatric. Searches were performed in MEDLINE, Cochrane, Embase, and PsycINFO for studies up to March 15, 2024. Quality and risk of bias were assessed using the Newcastle Ottawa Scale (NOS). Studies were eligible for inclusion if they were original, peer-reviewed research which assessed human offspring of any age, prenatally exposed to any antipsychotic medication, regardless of maternal indication for use. Results We identified 1,315 studies, and reviewed 53 in full-text screening. The final synthesis included 16 studies (6 cohort and 10 register-based studies) with the number of prenatally exposed individuals ranging from 17 to >15,000.Eleven studies included a control group with maternal mental illness in at least one of their analyses. These groups varied with some including any maternal mental illness, while others used an antipsychotic discontinuation control, and still others used non-antipsychotic psychiatric medication use as a control. Five studies included only a general or healthy maternal population control. Eight studies assessed motor development, ranging from newborn assessments up to 14 years of follow-up. These studies observed early motor delays following prenatal exposure to AP medication, which did not persist into later childhood. Five studies investigated risk for neurodevelopmental diagnoses and three studies explored school performance following prenatal AP exposure. No significant associations were found after adjustment for confounding. The quality of the evidence ranged from moderate to high. Conclusions While the majority of studies did not identify differences between exposed and unexposed groups, some differences emerged early in infancy or when looking at neurodevelopmental disorders. However, our findings suggest that the observed neurodevelopmental differences are likely due to confounding by indication rather than exposure to antipsychotics themselves. More rigorous research is needed to clarify the neurodevelopmental effects of AP use during pregnancy. Disclosure of Interest None Declared
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction machine sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.
Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,005 | 0,023 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,007 | 0,006 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,009 | 0,010 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Communication savante | 0,002 | 0,002 |
| Science ouverte | 0,002 | 0,001 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,002 | 0,001 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,004 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».