Adaptation and evaluation of the program based on Specialized Coordinated Care for First Psychotic Episode in Chile - OnTrackChile: preliminary results of implementation fidelity
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
Introduction In high-income countries, Coordinated Specialized Care for First Psychotic Episode (FEP) programs have been shown to be effective in reducing symptoms and disability. Chile guarantees universal access to these services through a national policy, but previous research indicates that evidence-based approaches are not used. Our team adapted the OnTrackNY (OTNY) program to the Chilean context, called OnTrackChile (OTCH), to evaluate its effectiveness and implementation. This summary presents preliminary results on model fidelity, one of the primary outcomes of the study. Objectives To evaluate the fidelity of the implementation of the OTCH program in comparison with usual care services for FEP, analyzing its compliance in 18 key domains of care and its alignment with the National Mental Health Plan. Methods A fidelity scale was designed to guide data collection on OTCH implementation. The scale included the name and definition of each domain, along with a set of expectations. The scale assessed 18 key domains, such as staffing, team integration, communication, burden of care, service flexibility, crisis, treatment planning, prescribing, care management, working with families, and education and employment support, among others. The scale was applied in the 5 OTCH intervention sites and 8 control sites that maintained usual care included in the cluster-randomized controlled clinical trial. Results OTCH sites met more than 80% of the criteria for the domains assessed in the fidelity scale, which is more than twice the compliance observed in the control sites. In domains related to the usual functioning of the centers coincident with those established in the National Mental Health Plan, OTCH intervention sites exceeded compliance standards to control sites (p<0.001). In situations where the frequency of problems was similar between both types of centers, such as suicidal risk and risky substance use, OTCH centers showed significantly better performance (p<0.001) compared to control centers. Conclusions The implementation of the OTCH model has not only allowed the introduction of specific aspects of the program, but has also improved the overall performance of the centers in key areas defined by the National Mental Health Plan. This suggests that the implementation of OTCH in the Chilean context is not only feasible, but can also improve the quality of community mental health care. OnTrack Chile is funded by the U.S. National Institute of Mental Health (R01MH115502). Disclosure of Interest None Declared
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction distillée sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.
Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Communication savante | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Science ouverte | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule tête enseignante, pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».