Interventions used to support individual health literacy related to cardiovascular health in children – a scoping review
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
Background Recent studies indicate that risk factors for cardiovascular disease (CVD) begin to develop in childhood. Interventions that support the development of health literacy related to cardiovascular health (CVH) in childhood may be beneficial for improving cardiovascular risk factors in young people, however it is unclear whether such interventions exist.Aim To conduct a scoping review to identify all previous interventions that have combined health literacy (or related constructs) and CVH metrics in childhood settings.Methods Two reviewers systematically searched four databases: Medline, Scopus, CINAHL and Web of Science from inception to October 21, 2024. Studies were analysed following the Joanna Briggs Institute (JBI) framework for scoping reviews. Health literacy was defined based on Nutbeam’s health literacy framework. Related constructs included health promotion, health education and health knowledge among others. CVH metrics were defined based on the American Heart Association’s Life’s Essential 8 and included diet, physical activity, body mass index, blood pressure, cholesterol, glucose, smoking and sleep. Studies were included if they considered health literacy or related constructs and at least three CVH metrics.Results We reviewed 5,453 published papers written in English. These papers included empirical studies (original research) and intervention studies. They also covered quantitative studies such as cross-sectional, longitudinal, protocol, cohort, and case-control studies. From these, we identified 46 studies for inclusion in the review, of which 6 were protocols. The largest number of studies were conducted in the US (n = 13); the intervention length ranged from 5 weeks to 4 years and were conducted between 2007 and 2022. Only one intervention explicitly considered health literacy. This 6-week Canadian study, conducted with 126 children aged 9-14 years, measured digital health literacy using a validated questionnaire and CVH metrics (diet, physical activity and sleep). Forty-five other studies used constructs related to health literacy, including health promotion (n = 11), health education (n = 10) and health knowledge and behaviour (n = 8), among others.Conclusion This review identified one intervention that comprehensively measured health literacy and CVH in children. More work is required to understand whether interventions which combine health literacy (or related constructs) and CVH metrics in childhood settings may improve CVH.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction distillée sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.
Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,021 | 0,001 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,007 | 0,001 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,002 | 0,004 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,004 | 0,000 |
| Communication savante | 0,000 | 0,001 |
| Science ouverte | 0,003 | 0,004 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,001 | 0,003 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule tête enseignante, pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».