083 The need for inhalers to have dose counters: an observational study in Edmonton, Alberta, Canada
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
Objectives Inhalers are first-line treatment for many respiratory conditions including asthma and COPD. A crucial feature of inhalers is the dose counter, allowing individuals to track the number of doses of medicine remaining. Yet, while dry powder inhalers (DPIs) typically have dose counters, many commonly used metered dose inhalers (MDIs) do not. Previous studies suggest that the absence of dose counters in MDIs can result in wasted medication or inhalers being used after they have run out of active medication (i.e., only propellant is left). Our objective was to determine if the absence of dose counters in our setting was associated with MDIs being discarded before all doses of active medication were used, or conversely, being used beyond doses of active medication. Method Inhalers were collected from May 2024–February 2025 (3 pharmacies) as part of our pilot inhaler recycling program in Edmonton, Alberta, Canada. We recorded the type of inhaler and doses of active medication remaining in each inhaler. For the inhalers with dose counters, doses remaining was taken from the dose counter; for the inhalers without dose counters, where published weight/dose relationships were available, the inhalers were weighed and doses remaining were calculated. Inhalers were excluded if they had 80% or more doses remaining, as these inhalers likely were not intended to be fully used. We also excluded inhalers with the active medication inserted for each use (e.g., HandiHaler), inhalers with unreadable dose counters, and inhalers without cannisters. Chi-squared analysis was performed. Results We collected 460 inhalers (33 different types), 368 met the inclusion criteria. All DPIs (212) had dose counters: 89% had nil doses remaining, 3% had 1–10% of doses remaining, and 8% had 11–80% of doses remaining. Among the MDIs with dose counters (36): 6% had negative doses, 61% had nil doses remaining, 8% had 1–10% of doses remaining, and 25% had 11–80% of doses remaining. Among the MDIs without dose counters and published weight/dose relationships (97): 31% had negative doses remaining, 3% had nil doses remaining, 5% had 1–10% of doses remaining, and 61% had 11–80% doses remaining. The difference in the distributions of doses among these groups of inhalers was statistically significant (P<.01). Additionally, there were 23 MDIs without dose counters and no published weight/dose relationship. Conclusion The significant difference in the distribution of doses remaining in inhalers with and without dose counters is concerning. It reinforces previous literature that has consistently shown that dose counters are critical—without dose counters most individuals are either using their MDIs beyond doses of active medication (i.e., only propellant) or discarding them prematurely. These results reinforce the need for regulations that will require MDIs to have dose counters.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction machine sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.
Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,001 | 0,002 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,002 | 0,004 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,005 | 0,002 |
| Communication savante | 0,002 | 0,001 |
| Science ouverte | 0,004 | 0,001 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,001 | 0,002 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,004 | 0,001 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».