OC50 Improvements in pruritus after maralixibat treatment are associated with improved health-related quality of life for patients with cholestatic liver disease
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
<h3></h3> Alagille syndrome (ALGS) and Progressive Familial lntrahepatic Cholestasis (PFIC) are rare cholestatic liver diseases (CLD) associated with severe pruritus along with markedly reduced health related quality of life (HRQoL). Maralixibat (MRX), an oral minimally absorbed ileal bile acid transporter (IBAT) inhibitor, is approved for the treatment of cholestatic pruritus in patients with ALGS ≥2 months of age and for the treatment of PFIC ≥3 months of age in the EU, respectively. This analysis assessed whether improvements in pruritus after MRX treatment are correlated with improvements in a variety of HRQoL domains in these CLD. The study designs of the Phase 2 randomized withdrawal period (RWD) ICONIC trial and Phase 3 randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled (PBO) MARCH trial have been previously described. Separate retrospective analyses of pruritus and HRQoL data from the ICONIC trial in ALGS (18 weeks of open-label MRX treatment) and the MARCH trial in PFIC (26 weeks of MRX or PBO treatment) were conducted. Patients in both studies had to have moderate to severe pruritus as measured using a validated caregiver-reported Itch Reported Outcome (ltchRO) severity assessment tool (0=none to 4=very severe). HRQoL was assessed using the Pediatric Quality of Life Inventory Generic Core (PedsQL; 0–100 scale, 100=best quality of life), Physical Health (PH), Psychosocial Health (PSH), and Multidimensional Fatigue (MF) scale scores, which were collected via caregiver in both studies. In MARCH, a subset of questions from the exploratory diary questionnaire (EDQ) focused on sleep disturbance were assessed for their relationship to pruritus improvement. Spearman’s (r) coefficients were determined to evaluate the relationship between pruritus improvements and HRQoL. A total of 28 patients with ALGS from ICONIC were included with a mean± SD baseline age of 5.4 ± 4.2 years, ltchRO score of 2.9 ± 0.5, PedsQL score of 60.3 ± 16.6, PH score of 64.7 ± 20.0, PSH score of 57.6 ± 16.7, and MF score of 51.2 ± 22.6. After 18 weeks of open-label MRX treatment, there was a significant positive correlation between pruritus improvement and improvements in Peds QL (r 0.50 [p=0.007]), PSH (r 0.47 [p=0.012]), and MF (r 0.71 [p=0.0002]). In MARCH, 55 patients from the AII-PFIC cohort (29 MRX, 26 PBO) were included in the analysis with a mean± SD baseline age of 4.9 ± 4.1 years, ltchRO score of 2.9 ± 0.9, PedsQL score of 55.8 ± 19.0, PH score of 61.5 ± 22.4, PSH score of 52.0 ± 20.2, MF score of 57.8 ± 20.4 and EDQ sleep disturbance score of 3.7 ± 0.8. Among MRX-treated participants after 26 weeks of treatment, there was a significant positive correlation between pruritus improvement and improvements in Peds QL (r 0.53 [p=0.003]), PH (r 0.50 [p=0.006]), PSH (r 0.47 [p=0.01]), and sleep (r 0.96 [p<0.0001]). In the PBO-treated participants, improvements in pruritus were significantly correlated with improvements in PSH (r 0.41 [p=0.039]) and sleep (r 0.88 [p<0.0001]). These data further illustrate the robustness of MRX’s impact on the relationship between pruritus improvement and HRQoL across multiple domains. Irrespective of the CLD studied, improvements in pruritus after MRX treatment were strongly associated with improvements in HRQoL.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction distillée sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.
Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Communication savante | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Science ouverte | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule tête enseignante, pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».