Free energy perturbations in enzyme kinetic models reveal cryptic epistasis
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
Abstract Epistasis—the context-dependence of mutational effects—is a key driver of protein evolution, influencing adaptive pathways and functional diversity. While specific epistasis arises from direct physical interactions between mutations, non-specific epistasis emerges when a non-linear mapping links a protein’s biophysical properties to its function. Enzyme kinetic parameters are assumed to be devoid of non-specific epistasis when measured in vitro , enabling direct connection of epistasis to the enzyme’s structural features. Here, we show that this assumption is incorrect: enzyme catalytic parameters like k cat and K M inherently exhibit non-specific epistasis due to the multi-state nature of the catalytic cycle. Using in silico enzyme models, parameterized by free energies of ground and transition states, we simulated 1000 “mutations” or perturbations to the sub-state free energies within the kinetic ensemble. We then combined these mutations, creating one million double mutants with strictly additive free energy effects. Despite the absence of explicit mutational interactions, we observed substantial epistasis in catalytic parameters; its prevalence and complexity increasing with the number of kinetic states in the mechanism. We derived analytical conditions for the emergence of this form of epistasis in a simple kinetic model, demonstrating that non-specific epistasis depends on the relative values of key microscopic rate constants. Finally, we validated our framework by reanalyzing kinetic data for double mutants in Bacillus cereus β-lactamase I and found that reported specific epistasis in catalytic efficiency was substantially stronger than previously inferred, altering mechanistic interpretations. Our results identify an intrinsic, previously unknown source of epistasis that can distort both the magnitude and sign of mutational effects in enzyme kinetics. We provide theoretical and computational tools for recognizing and correcting for this form of non-specific epistasis, enabling accurate mechanistic inference from kinetic data and improving our understanding of the links between epistasis, structure-function relationships, enzyme evolution, and protein design. Author Summary Enzymes help organisms convert reactants to products through a series of steps; each associated with an energy that dictates how well the enzyme catalyzes a reaction. Enzymes evolve to become more efficient, or catalyze new reactions, through mutations that change the free energies of these steps. Sometimes, the effect of one mutation depends on the presence of another, a phenomenon called epistasis. Epistasis is typically studied by measuring the effect of mutations on standard enzyme parameters under the assumption that changes in these values reflect structural interactions between mutations in the protein. Our study shows that this assumption is misleading. Even when mutations act independently on the energies of steps in an enzyme’s reaction, when combined they can create epistasis. This phenomenon arises from the complex, non-linear relationships between the parameters that define each step in the enzyme reaction and the measurements we obtain during experiments probing enzyme functions. Using computational simulations, we mathematically derive the necessary conditions for this form of epistasis, demonstrate that epistasis increases in prevalence as the enzyme reaction becomes more complex, and apply our model to published experimental data. Our findings urge that researchers should account for these effects before drawing structural conclusions from epistasis.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction machine sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.
Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,001 | 0,003 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,000 | 0,001 |
| Communication savante | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Science ouverte | 0,000 | 0,001 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,001 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».