MétaCan
Menu
Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W4414265856 · doi:10.1111/curt.70031

<scp>Bones</scp> : <scp>The Life and Adventures of Doctor Archibald Menzies</scp> , GraemeMenzies Published in 2024 by Whittles Publishing Ltd. 142 pages, illustrated. <scp>ISBN</scp> 9781849955911.

2025· article· en· W4414265856 sur OpenAlexaboutno aff
Thomas Freeth

Notice bibliographique

RevueCurtis s Botanical Magazine · 2025
Typearticle
Langueen
DomaineMedicine
ThématiqueHistory of Medical Practice
Établissements canadiensnon disponible
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésAdventureContext (archaeology)PublishingNarrativeBiographyStyle (visual arts)Subject (documents)Hollywood

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

Trees from the western edge of the American continent have changed the British landscape more than any other part of the world. Douglas fir (Pseudotsuga menziesii) is the tallest tree on the Isles; Sitka spruce (Picea sitchensis) carpets half the nation's plantations; the monkey puzzle (Araucaria araucana) is without doubt the most recognisable garden conifer. The first scientific records of these giants arose from the momentous and demanding expeditions detailed in Bones: The Life and Adventures of Doctor Archibald Menzies. Graeme Menzies, a Canadian writer with an interest in military history and British Columbia, asserts there are biographical gaps on his namesake and positions himself as the chronicler, seeking to add broader context to the narrow botanical focus of existing works. It is clear from the outset he feels a romanticised connection to his clansman as a person and not just a historical figure. This empathy allows the reader to place themself effectively in Archibald's shoes. Chapters are loosely chronological and the style is engaging, accessible and novelistic in places. The author contends that primary historical sources for Archibald are scant and scattered and laments the irretrievably lost nature of material that would help complete his story. One such document is Archibald's journal from his voyage with Captain James Colnett to Nootka Sound 1786–88. Where no primary sources exist, speculation on what Archibald may have thought and conversations he might have had are introduced. This oscillation between archival detail and narrative conjecture is disorienting at first. The author is candid about his weaving of fact and fiction in the preface. A bibliography, maps and images and extensive endnotes are provided. Botanical convention is inconsistently handled, and an index to more than 50 ships is presented, but none for plants. The Canadian and Hawaiian legs of the expeditions are the focus, with California and Chile barely mentioned. Readers expecting a complete chronicle or a detailed summation of botanical specimens collected by Archibald may be a little disappointed. Bones is narrative-driven and selective. One curious omission is that the title is not explained, though it perhaps has a connection to the naval term sawbones for a ship's surgeon. What adventures they were. Graeme Menzies' descriptive prose shines in his naval set-pieces, notably the Battle of the Saintes (1782). The reader is left to ponder Archibald's reality as the ship's medic when the guns drew silent, witness to men ‘shot, flogged, maimed and murdered.’ The author is keen to share Archibald's interaction with native people and religious views and positions him as an early progressive thinker. He also illuminates Archibald's contribution to the field of virology in downright dangerous conditions. Modern botanists and horticulturists will find the detail of Archibald's developmental route insightful. Rising from modest beginnings he circumnavigated the globe twice before returning to London as a respected physician, naturalist and explorer of great renown. The Royal Botanic Gardens of Kew and Edinburgh play a key role in the story, as does his exposure to a litany of noteworthy figures of the 18th century enlightenment. One illuminating tale concerns Sir Joseph Banks, Kew's de facto director, who secured Archibald's place on Captain George Vancouver's Discovery. Archibald was accordingly answerable directly to the King and solely responsible for botanical matters, undermining the irascible Vancouver's authority. Vancouver reassigned a crew member from horticultural tasks, leading to the loss of many living specimens in the purpose-built plant case. The quarrel between the two that followed was so fierce that Vancouver had Archibald arrested. Only a formal written apology from Archibald and Banks smoothing things out with the Admiralty would de-escalate the situation. The book closes by describing Archibald's life back in London as a distinguished member of the scientific community. The epilogue contains musings of what Archibald may have made of the London that came after him. A minor irritation is that Messrs Aiton are repeatedly referred to as directors of Kew. They were of course head gardeners; Kew had no formal director until William Jackon Hooker in 1841. The relationship between Archibald and David Douglas is briefly covered. Douglas is, perhaps unfairly, more generally widely known. Menzies lived to 88, a longevity that left fewer opportunities for romantic mythmaking than Douglas's tragic end in a Hawaiian pit trap at just 35. The imperative for Douglas's work was horticultural introduction rather than the scientific discovery that drove Archibald. It is therefore fair to regard the two side by side. Archibald reconnoitred the area extensively for the first time; Douglas used this information to revisit and collect material in greater quantity and quality which resulted in successful cultivation in Europe. Modern plant collecting still follows these basic principles. Graeme Menzies succeeds in bringing overlooked elements of his remarkable namesake to the surface, though greater botanical detail would have enriched the portrait. Though contradictory in style, the blending of thorough research and digressions into imagined thoughts are an effective device for immersion. The author also succeeds in this regard, the immersion allowing us to get to know the subject a little better. A final thought provoked by Bones: Archibald Menzies documented hundreds of species new to western science but published rarely. The author, a marketing professional, quips ruefully in the epilogue ‘he earned many possible epitaphs [but] in no way was he ever considered a good publicist’. He also ponders whether Archibald was living in the present or the future rather than looking back, or if he lacked the ego required to catalogue his life in his own words. The lesson for us is clear: publication is a responsibility, not a vanity. As botanists and horticulturists, we must take care to ensure that knowledge is shared, not lost.

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier

Prédiction distillée sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,004
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,129
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesMétarecherche, Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict), Intégrité de la recherche
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Sans objet · Signal consensuel: Sans objet
GenreSignal candidat: Empirique · Signal consensuel: Empirique
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,206
Score d'incertitude au seuil0,999

Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0040,129
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0010,001
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0020,000
Bibliométrie0,0010,003
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0000,002
Communication savante0,0010,002
Science ouverte0,0010,001
Intégrité de la recherche0,0010,004
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0000,000

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,016
Tête enseignante GPT0,266
Écart entre enseignants0,250 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle

Classification

machine, non validée

Prédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule tête enseignante, pas un consensus.

Devis d'étudeSans objet
Domainenon disponible
GenreEmpirique

Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».

En bref

Citations0
Publié2025
Routes d'admission1
Résumé présentoui

Explorer davantage

Même revueCurtis s Botanical MagazineMême sujetHistory of Medical PracticeTravaux en français237 207