MétaCan
Menu
Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W4414311535 · doi:10.1016/j.cliser.2025.100609

Unveiling heatwave events in Bangladesh: Insights from observational records and ERA5 reanalysis data

2025· article· en· W4414311535 sur OpenAlex

Pourquoi ce travail est dans la base

Une base qui oublie comment elle a trouvé un travail ne peut pas être vérifiée. Voici les voies qui ont admis celui-ci.

affAu moins un auteur déclare une institution canadienne dans l'instantané OpenAlex épinglé.

Notice bibliographique

RevueClimate Services · 2025
Typearticle
Langueen
DomaineEnvironmental Science
ThématiqueClimate variability and models
Établissements canadiensUniversity of CalgaryUniversity of Waterloo
Organismes subventionnairesLeverhulme Trust
Mots-clésObservational studyNocturnalClimate changeHumiditySubtropicsPercentile

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

Heatwaves (HWs) are escalating in frequency and intensity, posing serious risks to human health, agriculture, and infrastructure worldwide. However, the lack of a universally accepted definition of HWs complicates consistent characterization across regions. In Bangladesh, a subtropical country increasingly vulnerable to extreme heat, the dynamics of HWs remain insufficiently understood. This study aims to bridge that knowledge gap by analyzing three decades of observational data to characterize HWs in Bangladesh, using ambient and apparent temperature metrics. Five HW indices were employed to assess 24-hour (EHF), daytime (CTX90pct, TX90), and nocturnal (CTN90pct, TN90) HW patterns, with humidity effects incorporated through apparent temperature-based indices. HWs were defined as events lasting at least three consecutive days, reflecting the heightened health risks of prolonged exposure. HWs were evaluated in terms of frequency, duration, intensity, and early onset patterns. Station-based observations were compared against corresponding estimates derived from ERA5 reanalysis data. The 90 th percentile of daily temperature emerged as a robust operational threshold for HW characterization in Bangladesh. Declines in temperature variability during HW events were linked to reduced intensities for indices sensitive to short-term variability or independent of seasonality. Humidity exerted a stronger influence on nocturnal HWs than on daytime events, while seasonal variations in temperature and humidity during the pre- and post-monsoon periods significantly shaped HW characteristics. These findings provide new insights into the spatiotemporal dynamics of HWs in Bangladesh, offering an evidence base to inform adaptation strategies in other subtropical regions facing similar climate threats. This study provides critical insights into the growing challenges of HWs in Bangladesh, highlighting their increasing frequency, duration, intensity, and earlier onset. The findings underscore the importance of adopting the 90 th percentile of daily temperature as a reliable threshold for HW characterization, tailored to Bangladesh’s subtropical climate. The study reveals distinct regional and seasonal patterns, with coastal areas experiencing prolonged HWs and humidity-driven nocturnal events, which significantly disrupt nighttime recovery and productivity. Policymakers can leverage these insights to develop localized mitigation strategies, such as early warning systems, urban heat management plans, and infrastructure adaptations to reduce HW impacts. The results emphasize the role of humidity in intensifying heat stress, calling for integrated approaches that consider both ambient temperature and apparent temperature metrics in HW assessments. Furthermore, the methodology used in this study is transferable to other similar climatic contexts, making the results valuable for informing policy in regions beyond Bangladesh that face comparable challenges. By addressing gaps in observational data and incorporating indoor heat stress and continuous surface data in future research, the findings offer a pathway to designing more robust climate resilience frameworks. These measures are essential for safeguarding vulnerable populations, ensuring public health, and minimizing socio-economic losses from extreme heat events both locally and globally.

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Prédiction distillée sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,000
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesaucune
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Observationnel · Signal consensuel: Observationnel
GenreSignal candidat: Empirique · Signal consensuel: Empirique
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,229
Score d'incertitude au seuil1,000

Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0000,000
Bibliométrie0,0000,000
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0000,000
Communication savante0,0000,001
Science ouverte0,0000,001
Intégrité de la recherche0,0000,000
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0010,000

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,045
Tête enseignante GPT0,286
Écart entre enseignants0,241 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle