HARMONISATION OF UKRAINIAN LEGISLATION IN THE FIELD OF ORGANIC PRODUCTION WITH INTERNATIONAL STANDARDS
Pourquoi ce travail est dans la base
Une base qui oublie comment elle a trouvé un travail ne peut pas être vérifiée. Voici les voies qui ont admis celui-ci.
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
The article examines the process of harmonising Ukrainian legislation in the field of organic production with international and European standards. It analyses the conceptual and legal essence of harmonisation as an instrument of legal integration, in particular its role in ensuring the compatibility of the national legal field with EU regulations, Codex Alimentarius and FAO and IFOAM recommendations. The purpose of the article is to study the theoretical, methodological and practical foundations for harmonising Ukrainian legislation in the field of organic production with international standards, in particular EU standards, and to justify ways of improving it. The article reviews Ukrainian legislation in the field of organic production and describes the institutional mechanism for state control and certification. It identifies key challenges facing Ukraine in implementing international requirements, including insufficient detail in national standards, limited state support, certification issues, and the need to improve a number of procedures. Particular attention is paid to the need to adapt to the requirements of Regulation (EU) No. 2018/848 and the role of the Association Agreement with the EU as an instrument of legal compatibility. Current international trends in the development of the organic products market are analysed, confirming the strategic importance of legal harmonisation in the field of sustainable agriculture. Priority areas for improving legal policy in Ukraine have been identified, covering legislative, institutional, informational, educational and international aspects. Harmonisation of legislation in this area is seen as the basis for improving the competitiveness of the agricultural sector, ensuring transparency in the organic market and fulfilling Ukraine's international obligations. Key aspects of legal compatibility have been studied, including the ban on GMOs, certification requirements, transparency of labelling, traceability of the supply chain and adaptation of the control system. National and international approaches to organic production in the EU, the US, Canada and Japan were characterised, and the level of compliance of Ukrainian legislation with international standards was assessed using comparative and SWOT analysis. The study identified the strengths of national legislation, in particular the legal definition of organic production, the ban on the use of GMOs, the creation of a state register of operators, and active participation in international technical assistance programmes. At the same time, problematic aspects were identified, such as insufficient regulation of aquaculture, a limited number of certification bodies, unclear procedures for importing organic products, and fragmented use of international labelling. The scientific novelty of the article lies in a comprehensive approach to analysing Ukraine's legislative framework from the perspective of its compliance with EU standards, as well as in the development of a model for adapting national legislation to international requirements. A set of strategic directions for improving the legislative and institutional system has been proposed: updating the basic law in line with changes in EU legislation, strengthening the institutional capacity of control bodies, introducing a digital certification platform, developing legal awareness among farmers and consumers, and deepening international co-operation. Harmonisation of national legislation is defined not only as formal coordination of regulatory texts, but also as a systemic transformation of the legal, institutional and educational environments with the aim of achieving Ukraine's full integration into the international organic market.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Prédiction distillée sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.
Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Communication savante | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Science ouverte | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle