Knowledge and Perceptions of AI Among Medical Students in Morocco: Cross-Sectional Study
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
Background: Artificial intelligence (AI) is rapidly transforming medical practice by enhancing diagnostic accuracy, streamlining workflows, and supporting clinical decision-making. However, the integration of AI into health care largely depends on the preparedness and acceptance of future physicians. Therefore, assessing their knowledge and perceptions of AI is crucial. Notably, no study has yet evaluated these factors among medical students in Morocco. Objective: The aim of this study was to describe Moroccan medical students' knowledge and perception of AI. Methods: A cross-sectional, observational study was conducted from February to May 2023 at the Faculty of Medicine and Pharmacy, Agadir, Morocco. All undergraduate medical students from the first to the seventh year were eligible, excluding graduate students. A snowball sampling method was used, with a calculated minimum sample size of 385. To account for potential missing data, and given the target population size of 1150, the sample size was increased by 50%. Data were collected through a validated online questionnaire and analyzed using JAMOVI 2.6.2, with significance set at P<.05. Results: A total of 580 medical students (female n=363, 62.6%; mean age 21.3, SD 2.13 years; response rate 50.4%) participated. While 96% (n=557) had heard of AI, 73.1% (n=424) were unfamiliar with key AI terminologies, only 11% (n=64) understood AI functioning, and 14.8% (n=86) were familiar with everyday AI applications. Objectively, 88.1% (n=511) correctly identified deep learning as a method for automated pattern recognition, with 71.5% (n=415) acknowledging its interpretability challenges. First-cycle students demonstrated significantly higher familiarity with AI terms (83/156, 53.2% vs 51/156, 32.7% vs 22/156, 14.1%; P<.001). In terms of perception, 83% (n=482) viewed AI as a collaborative tool, 84.1% (n=488) anticipated a transformative impact on medicine, 39% (n=227) expected noninterventional medicine to be replaced within a decade, and 57.1% (n=331) believed certain specialties could be supplanted by AI. Regarding AI in medical education, 90% (n=522) supported its integration into the curriculum and 94% (n=546) expected enhanced learning conditions, but only 48.1% (n=279) felt ready to use AI tools upon graduation. Additionally, gender and technology familiarity significantly influenced specific perceptions, with technology-savvy students reporting greater readiness (P<.001) and women more likely to view AI as revolutionary (315/488, 64.5% vs 173/488, 35.5%; P=.02). Conclusions: Medical students' knowledge of AI is still limited, but their awareness of the potential impact of this technology on future practice and their openness to its integration into the medical curriculum constitute a promising basis for the successful implementation of these new concepts in our health care system.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction machine sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.
Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,001 | 0,002 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Communication savante | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Science ouverte | 0,000 | 0,001 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,002 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».