Notice bibliographique
Résumé
María de Santo Domingo (b. c. 1486–d. 1524) was a Dominican tertiary who acquired extraordinary fame for her prophecies and revelations. She gained support from powerful figures such as Cardinal Cisneros and King Ferdinand the Catholic and participated in the reform of the Dominican order. She was, along with her contemporary Juana de la Cruz (b. 1481–d. 1534), one of the most renowned Castilian visionary women before Teresa of Avila and an author of spiritual works. However, María de Santo Domingo (like Juana de la Cruz) did not write the works herself; rather, it was her Dominican followers who recorded her words. The main information about her life and spirituality comes from the records of the last of the four trials or examinations held to decide on the sanctity of her life (1509–1510), and from the two texts she composed: the Book of Prayer and the Revelations, both of which have recently been edited. Secondary sources include the accounts of the foundation of her convent, exchanged letters, and chronicles of the Dominican order. She was called the Beata of Piedrahita (Avila) because of the support given to her by the reformist friars of the Piedrahita convent, which was where she took the habit of the Third Order around 1504, and where the fame created by her supernatural experiences began. After living in the beaterio (a house for women of the Third Order) of Santa Catalina (Avila), traveling to the itinerant court, and visiting convents with the purpose of reform during years of controversial activity, around 1514 she moved to the convent of Aldeanueva (Avila), built for her community by the Second Duke of Alba. Despite her fame, the Order of Preachers did not initiate a beatification process after her death, likely because she had contributed to the schism within the order by supporting the reformers. Although an ecclesiastical court acquitted her, her revelations were ultimately prohibited from being spread, and she was forbidden from communicating with the outside world. From the end of the nineteenth century until the 1990s, María de Santo Domingo was linked either to a heterodox movement (Alumbradism) or to the reform of the Dominican order encouraged by Cisneros. This selective bibliography shows how not only did the political and theological circumstances surrounding María play a significant role in her life and works, but so did the inspiration of other notable female mystics in medieval Europe, such as the Italian “living saints.”
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction distillée sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.
Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Communication savante | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Science ouverte | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule tête enseignante, pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».