The Safety Data of Dupilumab for the Treatment of Moderate‑to‑Severe Atopic Dermatitis in Infants, Children, Adolescents, and Adults
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
Atopic dermatitis (AD) significantly affects quality of life in patients of all ages and requires long-term treatment. Dupilumab is approved for uncontrolled moderate-to-severe AD in patients aged ≥ 6 months and in other type 2 inflammatory diseases. Data from placebo-controlled, randomized clinical trials (RCTs) and long-term open-label extensions (OLEs) enable comprehensive assessment of dupilumab’s safety profile for up to 5 years. To integrate short- and long-term dupilumab safety data in patients with moderate-to-severe AD. We describe safety from eight phase 3 trials with > 7000 patient-years of dupilumab use: five 16-week RCTs in children (6 months–11 years, with concomitant topical corticosteroids [TCS]) and adolescents and adults (≥ 12 years, without TCS); one 52-week RCT in adults (with TCS); and two OLEs in children and adolescents (6–11- and 12–18-year cohorts, ± TCS, duration ≤ 1 year) and adults (± TCS, duration ≤ 5 years). The proportion of patients experiencing ≥ 1 treatment-emergent adverse event (TEAE) in RCTs was lower with dupilumab versus placebo in children/infants and was similar with dupilumab versus placebo in adults/adolescents. Exposure-adjusted incidence rates with longer-term treatment in OLEs were similar to the RCTs. Most TEAEs reported in RCT and OLE studies were mild to moderate and not related to study drug (per investigators). Fewer patients in the dupilumab versus placebo treatment arms experienced serious TEAEs (16-week RCTs: infants/children 0.8% vs 3.0%; adults/adolescents 2.0–2.2% vs 4.6%; 52-week RCT: 3.2–3.6% vs 5.1%). Common TEAEs that had higher incidence rates with dupilumab compared with placebo in RCTs included injection-site reactions (Medical Dictionary for Regulatory Activities High Level Term) and conjunctivitis (clustered term). Serious infections and non-herpetic skin infections were more frequent with placebo. In the most comprehensive dupilumab safety assessment to date, safety was consistent with the known dupilumab safety profile. [Graphical abstract and video abstract available.] ClinicalTrials.gov Identifiers: NCT03346434; NCT03345914; NCT03054428; NCT02277743; NCT02277769; NCT02260986; NCT01949311; NCT02612454. EudraCT: 2016-000955-28; 2016-004997-16; 2015-004458-16; 2014-001198-15; 2014-002619-40; 2013-003254-24; 2013-001449-15; 2015-001396-40. Atopic dermatitis is a chronic skin disease that affects people of all ages. Since patients with atopic dermatitis require continuous, life-long treatment, doctors and patients must understand the risks and benefits of treatment options before choosing one medication over another. This study reviews the safety of the drug dupilumab, which is used to treat infants, children, adolescents, and adults who have moderate-to-severe atopic dermatitis that is not well controlled with topical corticosteroids. We looked at side effects and safety data from more than 4000 patients who received either dupilumab or placebo treatment for up to 5 years in eight clinical trials. This study is the largest safety analysis of dupilumab to date. We found that children 6 months to 11 years receiving dupilumab had fewer side effects than patients in the placebo group. Adolescents and adults (12 years and older) taking dupilumab and placebo had similar rates of side effects. Serious side effects were more frequent in the placebo than in the dupilumab group in all age groups. Most side effects in patients who received dupilumab were mild or moderate, were not caused by dupilumab, and did not stop patients from taking dupilumab. The most common side effects that occurred more frequently in dupilumab-treated patients were pain or swelling around the injection location, common colds, and conjunctivitis. In conclusion, the safety of dupilumab in over 3000 patients in this study is consistent with the known dupilumab safety profile for infants, children, adolescents, and adults.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction distillée sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.
Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,000 | 0,001 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,000 | 0,001 |
| Communication savante | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Science ouverte | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule tête enseignante, pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».