Theoretical and Practical Leadership in Nursing Curriculum: A Scoping Review of the Literature
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
Introduction The purpose of this scoping review was to answer the research questions: What is known from the existing literature about theoretical leadership content offered in the nursing curriculum at the undergraduate or graduate level? and What is known from the existing literature about leadership practicums/experiential learning content in nursing curriculum at the undergraduate or graduate level? Method A scoping review using Arksey and O’Malley's Framework (2005) was carried out from February to May 2024. Databases searched included Nursing & Allied Health; PsycINFO; Web of Science; Embase; MEDLINE via Ovid; CINAHL and Education Source via EBSCOhost. Thematic analysis was conducted on the articles that met the inclusion criteria. Results Thirteen studies were included in this review. After data analysis was completed three themes were identified: (1) The What : What is taught in the theoretical and clinical leadership courses which includes concepts such as interpersonal communication, conflict management, and delegation; (2) The How : How theoretical and leadership courses are taught. Within this theme different modalities such as simulation based learning, experiential learning opportunities through clinical practicums, service learning and dedicated educational units were discussed; 3) The Why : Outcomes of theoretical and clinical leadership courses, that is improvement in students’ knowledge and leadership skills as well as the development of self-confidence in their leadership skills. Conclusion Although there is no overall blueprint listing the leadership concepts and skills that need to be included in nursing curriculum, certain leadership concepts and skills such as interpersonal communication, conflict resolution and delegation are taught as part of leadership curriculum using a variety of educational approaches such as simulation, clinical practicums and classroom learning. However, a standardized nursing leadership curriculum using an evidence-based approach that integrates essential leadership competencies will help nursing students develop confidence, accountability, and readiness as they transition into professional roles.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction distillée sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.
Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,002 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,000 | 0,002 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,000 | 0,001 |
| Communication savante | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Science ouverte | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,000 | 0,001 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule tête enseignante, pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».