Notice bibliographique
Résumé
Introduction. Nikolai Vladimirovich Chekhov (1865-1947), a full member of the Academy of Pedagogical Sciences of the RSFSR (further – APS), entered the history of Russian education as a prominent teacher of the last quarter of the XIX – first half of the XX centuries. His whole life is an example of selfless service to the interests of the Russian people. Materials and methods. The author used the following research methods: historical and biographical, analysis of scientific and pedagogical, memoir and local history literature, as well as axiological and regional approaches, which made it possible to highlight all the most valuable things in Chekhov's pedagogical heritage and identify opinions about him from his contemporaries and students. The publications of a number of Russian and foreign researchers were used in the process of work. Results. During his student years, Chekhov was a member of the student scientific society, whose secretary was A. I. Ulyanov. Later, Chekhov worked for more than 60 years as an ordinary teacher and head of a school, an administrator of a district (county) scale, and for the first half of his many years of activity he worked under the conditions of the tsarist autocracy, and the second half under Soviet rule. At the same time, he always managed to remain himself, not to change the principles of humanism and social justice. Chekhov was one of the co-founders of the APS (1943), the author of a significant number of valuable manuals and books. In total, he has published about 800 materials. KEYWORDS Discussion. Chekhov had to enter into scientific disputes with other specialists, in particular, to defend the legitimacy of the very concept of "children's literature". He opposed "gray" books, "pinkertonism", "stiltedness" and other shortcomings. He advocated the creation of a new type of teacher who combined deep knowledge and love for his native people. Conclusion. Chekhov was one of those figures of public education who paved the way for the development of the national education system and pedagogical science. People's Commissar of Education V. P. Potemkin, a graduate student from Vyatka, an advanced teacher A. I. Kondakov and other contemporaries highly appreciated his multifaceted activities. Chekhov's theoretical legacy deserves further study.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction distillée sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.
Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,000 | 0,001 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,000 | 0,001 |
| Communication savante | 0,000 | 0,001 |
| Science ouverte | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule tête enseignante, pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».