MétaCan
Menu
← Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W4414566523 · doi:10.5683/sp3/twikmk

Care-PD

2025· preprint· en· W4414566523 sur OpenAlexaffabout
Vida Adeli, Ivan Klabučar, Benjamin Filtjens, Soroush Mehraban, Diwei Wang, Hye-Won Seo, Candice Muller, Claudia Neves de Oliveira, Pieter Ginis, Moran Gilat, Alice Nieuwboer, Joke Spildooren, J. Lucas McKay, Gari D. Clifford, Andrea Iaboni, Babak Taati

Notice bibliographique

RevueHAL (Le Centre pour la Communication Scientifique Directe) · 2025
Typepreprint
Langueen
DomaineMedicine
ThématiqueParkinson's Disease Mechanisms and Treatments
Établissements canadiensUniversity Health NetworkCanada Research ChairsToronto Rehabilitation InstituteUniversity of Toronto
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésGaitMotion captureMotion (physics)Range of motionGait analysisTask (project management)

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

<!DOCTYPE html> Overview Please read carefully the terms and conditions and any accompanying documentation at neurips2025.care-pd.ca/terms-of-use before you download and/or use the CARE-PD dataset. Project page: https://neurips2025.care-pd.ca/ CARE-PD is the largest publicly available archive of 3D mesh gait data for Parkinson's Disease (PD) and the first to include data collected across multiple sites. The dataset aggregates 9 cohorts from 8 clinical sites, including 362 participants spanning a range of disease severity. All recordings—whether from RGB video or motion capture—are unified into anonymized SMPL body gait meshes through a curated harmonization pipeline. This dataset enables two main benchmarks: Supervised clinical score prediction: Estimating UPDRS gait scores from 3D meshes Unsupervised motion pretext tasks for Parkinsonian gait representation learning Dataset Contents CARE-PD consists of 9 harmonized datasets: 3DGait – Clinical gait recordings with UPDRS scores BMCLab – Gait recordings with medication status and UPDRS scores (original license: CC BY 4.0) DNE – Contains healthy, Parkinson's, and other neurological conditions (original license: CC BY 4.0) E-LC – Medication status (on/off) and PD subtypes KUL-DT-T – Freezer/non-freezer subtypes PD-GaM – Clinical gait recordings with UPDRS scores T-SDU – Ambient walking recordings T-SDU-PD – PD patient walking with UPDRS scores T-LTC – Ambient walking recordings Canonicalized SMPL files *_canonical.pkl files in the Canonicalized_SMPL_pickles folder keep the same nested dataset format as the original pickles. The canonical versions change only the motion coordinates: pose/trans are rotated so the motion uses a shared coordinate system. x = lateral y = up z = forward They also preprocess translation so: The first frame starts at x=0, z=0 The body stands/walks on y=0 Note: KUL-DT-T and E-LC are the only datasets that are not purely straight walking sequences, so for these two datasets the subject is canonicalized to start facing z+ in the first frame. Data Structure The main SMPL datasets are provided in a standardized format: { "anonymized_subject_id": { "anonymized_walk_id": { "pose": array, # SMPL pose parameters (shape varies by dataset) "trans": array, # Translation data "beta": array, # Body shape parameters (zeros for privacy) "fps": int, # Frames per second (standardized) "UPDRS_GAIT": int, # Clinical score (0-3) or None if unavailable "medication": str, # Medication status or None if unavailable "other": str # Additional labels or None if unavailable } } } Additionally, we provide h36m, HumanML3D, and SMPL_6D formats. Getting Started Please refer to https://github.com/TaatiTeam/CARE-PD for getting started with the dataset. Benchmarks CARE-PD includes data splits to test generalization: 6-Fold (split per subject) Leave-one-subject-out Fixed train-test splits (split per subject) The former two are only provided for the supervised clinical score prediction task. Terms of Use By accessing and using this database (the "Database"), users ("Users") acknowledge and agree to comply with the following conditions: License and Attribution The Database is publicly released under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license. Users must provide appropriate attribution by citing the Database and the original publications associated with each dataset accessed from the Database. Data Privacy and Ethics Users must not attempt to identify, contact, or otherwise compromise the anonymity of any individuals whose data is included in the Database. All use of the data must comply with applicable ethical guidelines and legal regulations, including privacy laws (e.g., GDPR, HIPAA, PIPEDA). Data Handling and Security Users must maintain appropriate data security measures to prevent unauthorized access, sharing, or use of the data. Users are encouraged, but not required, to direct third parties to the original Database URL rather than re-hosting the data. Intellectual Property Notice Copyright and other rights remain with the original data providers. Disclaimer of Warranty Use of the Database is subject to Section 5 (Disclaimer of Warranties and Limitation of Liability) of the CC BY-NC 4.0 licence. By using the Database, Users expressly acknowledge and agree to abide by these Terms of Use. Citation If you use CARE-PD in your research, please cite: Adeli V, Klabučar I, Rajabi J, Filtjens B, Mehraban S, Wang D, Seo H, Hoang T-H, Do MN, Muller C, Neves de Oliveira C, Boari Coelho D, Ginis P, Gilat M, Nieuwboer A, Spildooren J, McKay JL, Kwon H, Clifford G, Esper CD, Factor SA, Genias I, Dadashzadeh A, Shum L, Whone A, Mirmehdi M, Iaboni A, Taati B. CARE-PD: A Multi-Site Anonymized Clinical Dataset for Parkinson’s Disease Gait Assessment. In: Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems (NeurIPS); 2025. Additionally, please cite the relevant datasets: 3DGait Diwei Wang, Chaima Zouaoui, Jinhyeok Jang, Hassen Drira, and Hyewon Seo. 2023. Video-Based Gait Analysis for Assessing Alzheimer’s Disease and Dementia with Lewy Bodies. In Applications of Medical Artificial Intelligence: Second International Workshop, AMAI 2023, Held in Conjunction with MICCAI 2023, Vancouver, BC, Canada, October 8, 2023, Proceedings. Springer-Verlag, Berlin, Heidelberg, 72–82. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-47076-9_8 BMCLab Shida TKF, Costa TM, de Oliveira CEN, de Castro Treza R, Hondo SM, Los Angeles E, Bernardo C, Dos Santos de Oliveira L, de Jesus Carvalho M, Coelho DB. A public data set of walking full-body kinematics and kinetics in individuals with Parkinson's disease. Front Neurosci. 2023 Feb 16;17:992585. doi: 10.3389/fnins.2023.992585. PMID: 36875659; PMCID: PMC9978741. DNE Hoang TH, Zallek C, Do MN. Smartphone-Based Digitized Neurological Examination Toolbox for Multi-test Neurological Abnormality Detection and Documentation. IEEE J Biomed Health Inform. 2024 Aug 26;PP. doi: 10.1109/JBHI.2024.3439492. Epub ahead of print. PMID: 39186431. Hoang TH, Zehni M, Xu H, Heintz G, Zallek C, Do MN. Towards a Comprehensive Solution for a Vision-Based Digitized Neurological Examination. IEEE J Biomed Health Inform. 2022 Aug 26(8):4020-4031. doi: 10.1109/JBHI.2022.3167927. Epub 2022 Aug 11. PMID: 35439148; PMCID: PMC9707344. E-LC Lucas McKay J, Goldstein FC, Sommerfeld B, Bernhard D, Perez Parra S, Factor SA. Freezing of Gait can persist after an acute levodopa challenge in Parkinson's disease. NPJ Parkinsons Dis. 2019 Nov 22;5:25. doi: 10.1038/s41531-019-0099-z. PMID: 31799377; PMCID: PMC6874572. Kwon H, Clifford GD, Genias I, Bernhard D, Esper CD, Factor SA, McKay JL. An Explainable Spatial-Temporal Graphical Convolutional Network to Score Freezing of Gait in Parkinsonian Patients. Sensors (Basel). 2023 Feb 4;23(4):1766. doi: 10.3390/s23041766. PMID: 36850363; PMCID: PMC9968199. KUL-DT-T Spildooren J, Vercruysse S, Desloovere K, Vandenberghe W, Kerckhofs E, Nieuwboer A. Freezing of gait in Parkinson's disease: the im

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier

Prédiction machine sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,001
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,008
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesaucune
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Sans objet · Signal consensuel: Sans objet
GenreSignal candidat: Autre · Signal consensuel: aucune
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,313
Score d'incertitude au seuil0,000

Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0010,008
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0010,001
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0010,001
Bibliométrie0,0020,003
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0010,000
Communication savante0,0030,002
Science ouverte0,0020,002
Intégrité de la recherche0,0010,001
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,3130,307

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,015
Tête enseignante GPT0,258
Écart entre enseignants0,243 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle

Classification

machine, non validée

Prédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.

Les modèles n’ont appliqué aucune catégorie : rien dans la taxonomie ne correspondait à ce travail.
Devis d'étudeSans objet
Domainenon disponible
GenreAutre

Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».

En bref

Citations0
Publié2025
Routes d'admission2
Résumé présentoui

Explorer davantage

Même revueHAL (Le Centre pour la Communication Scientifique Directe)→Même sujetParkinson's Disease Mechanisms and Treatments→Travaux en français237 207→