Sleep and circadian health in the UK Biobank: Report on the 2023 sleep questionnaire enhancement
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
Abstract Study Objectives Our study introduced the 2023 UK Biobank sleep questionnaire and described variation in sleep health dimensions and prevalence of disordered sleep. Methods A questionnaire comprising validated measures and bespoke items was developed to capture key self-reported domains of sleep health and symptoms of sleep disorders. We quantified cohort prevalence of operationally defined sleep disorders and assessed patterning of sleep health dimensions across key sociodemographic and clinically relevant variables. Results 327,752 individuals were invited of whom 185,056 (56.5%) completed at least one module and were included in the analysis. Respondents were predominately from a White ethnic background (96.8%), had a mean age of 69.9 (SD, 7.5) years, 57.9% were female, and 25.5% were in employment. Compared to non-respondents, respondents were more likely to be female, tended to be better educated, healthier, and exhibit lower levels of socioeconomic deprivation, although baseline sleep variables were similar between respondents and non-respondents. Around 40% of respondents reported sleep duration less than 7 hours and 49% reported poor sleep quality (Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index > 5). Approximately one-quarter (25.2%) met criteria for at least one operationally defined sleep disorder, with insomnia being the most common (14.4%) followed by obstructive sleep apnoea (8.0%), restless legs syndrome (4.1%), and frequent nightmares (3.7%). Sleep disorders were associated with higher levels of anxiety, depression, fatigue, and cognitive complaints. Conclusions Poor sleep quality and operationally defined sleep disorders are common in the UK Biobank cohort. Sleep questionnaire data can now be integrated with a range of biomedical information to advance understanding of sleep. Statement of significance A comprehensive sleep questionnaire was introduced to the UK Biobank, with over 185,000 participants providing data. Overall, respondents reported relatively poor sleep quality; 40% reported sleep duration less than 7 hours, and 25% met criteria for at least one sleep disorder. Enhanced assessment of sleep in UK Biobank now enables integration with extensive biomedical data, including genetic, wearable, imaging, lifestyle, biomarker, and electronic health record data, offering opportunities to investigate the biological and environmental factors that influence sleep and circadian systems, and their impact on health.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction distillée sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.
Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,005 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Communication savante | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Science ouverte | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,000 | 0,001 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,001 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule tête enseignante, pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».