Abstract B081: Association between clonal hematopoiesis and survival outcomes in pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma: Analysis from the PASS-01 trial
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
Abstract Clonal hematopoiesis (CH) or presence of expanded hematopoietic clones harboring mutations in leukemia associated genes is associated with a higher risk of cardiovascular disease, myeloid malignancies and shorter overall survival. Incidence of CH increases with age, and CH is often found in patients with epithelial malignancies where it can be associated with worse outcomes. However, the impact of CH in pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) remains unclear. Here we study the impact of CH on outcomes in patients enrolled on the PASS-01 trial. PASS-01 is a randomized control phase 2 trial of patients with previously untreated metastatic PDAC who received either FOLFIRINOX or gemcitabine with nab-paclitaxel. As part of the PASS-01 trial, serial peripheral blood samples were collected. CH was identified using a 25-gene next-generation sequencing (NGS) panel assay on DNA extracted from pre-treatment buffy coat. CH was defined as the presence of a pathogenic mutations in any of the included genes on the panel with a variant allele frequency (VAF) ≥1%. Associations between CH and clinical outcomes including overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) were evaluated using Kaplan Meier method and significance was estimated using log-rank test. Cox proportional hazards regression was used to estimate hazard ratios (HRs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs).Results Of 140 patients included in the per-protocol analysis of PASS01, 137 pre-treatment samples were available, and 125 passed quality control metrics for CH analysis. CH mutations were detected in 46 patients (36.8%). The most frequently mutated genes were DNMT3A (60.9%), TET2 (17.4%), and ASXL1 (6.5%). Baseline characteristics were balanced between CH-positive and CH-negative patients though as expected CH was associated with a trend towards older age (Mean age 64.7 vs. 61.8 years, p = 0.08). In CH-positive versus negative patients, median OS was 9.4 months versus 9.6 months (HR = 0.91; 95% CI: 0.59–1.40; p = 0.67) and median PFS was 4.9 months versus 5.2 months, (HR = 0.97; 95% CI: 0.66–1.41; p = 0.85). Interestingly, in basal-like tumors (n = 23), CH (n = 7) was associated with a numerically shorter median OS (6.2 vs. 10.2 months; HR = 1.37; 95% CI: 0.51–3.69; p = 0.52) and median PFS (2.4 vs. 4.7 months; HR = 2.50; 95% CI: 0.93–6.84; p = 0.06). No such differences were observed in classical tumors (n = 70; 26 with CH). There were no difference in OS and PFS by presence of CH based on type of first line chemotherapy regimen patients received on the trial. Exploratory analyses evaluating only larger clones with VAF ≥ 2% did not change our findings. Presence of CH is not associated with adverse outcomes in PDAC, potentially related to high competing risk of PDAC related morbidity and mortality. We observe a provocative trend of worse outcomes in patients with CH and basal-like tumors which may reflect unique tumor biology. Additional studies interrogating impact of tumor infiltrating CH variants and mechanistic connections between tumor transcriptional subtype and CH are ongoing. Citation Format: Panot Sainamthip, Meenakshi Somadasan, Leigh Culnane, Elizabeth Andrews, Lauren Brais, Anna Dodd, Kimberly Perez, Kenneth Yu, Daniel Laheru, Daniel A. King, Grainne M. O’Kane, Steven Gallinger, David Tuveson, Elizabeth Jaffee, Jennifer J. Knox, Faiyaz Notta, Adam S. Sperling, Andrew J. Aguirre, Brian M. Wolpin, Harshabad Singh. Association between clonal hematopoiesis and survival outcomes in pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma: Analysis from the PASS-01 trial [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the AACR Special Conference in Cancer Research: Advances in Pancreatic Cancer Research—Emerging Science Driving Transformative Solutions; Boston, MA; 2025 Sep 28-Oct 1; Boston, MA. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2025;85(18_Suppl_3):Abstract nr B081.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction machine sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.
Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,005 | 0,004 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,001 | 0,002 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,000 | 0,001 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,000 | 0,001 |
| Communication savante | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Science ouverte | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,001 | 0,002 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,004 | 0,001 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».