Impact of Part-time Job on Academic Performance of 3rd Year College Student in Quezon City University
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
Nothing ever comes to one that is worth having, except because of hard work. (Booker T. Washington) Education is the foundation of all things in this world. It helps our society to become more productive, responsible, and competitive both academical- ly and non-academically. It is important because with an education we succeed to the trials and become a successful in our life. Working through college would not cover all of a student’s education expenses. It can lighten the debt burden, though, and pay off in other ways good news for the growing number of students who work while attend- ing school. Education is a process of receiving or giving systematic instruction at a school or university. There is a lot of bad and good impact of having part time jobs. Ac- cording to Fortenbury (2013), this day most college students are working according to the findings by City and seventeen magazines from a 2013 survey nearly four out of five or almost 80 percent of college students are working clock in a workload of 19 hours per week. The purpose of this study is to encourage our beloved students to continue their lives. Even though it’s hard for to them do some necessary things be- cause of their trials in life, especially their financial problem. This study also helps our beloved students to improve their study habits, to how they handle their studies while having a part-time job. The researchers used the Quantitative Method of research. Ac- cording to Babbie (2010), “Quantitative method emphasizes on objective measure- ments and numerical analysis of data collected through polls, questionnaire, or surveys. The researchers used purposive sampling. According to Ashley Crossman (2017), pur- posive sampling is a selection based on the characteristics of the population and the objective of the study. Purposive sampling is also known as judgmental, selective, or subjective sampling. The researchers present the initial draft of the questionnaire to our thesis adviser. After the comments, corrections, and suggestions, the researchers pre- pared an edited and correct draft for our adviser. The question is to develop and meas- ure the specific aspect of the assumption in the study. The study shown in the data that most of the respondents have the aged of 22 years old. Furthermore, it is shown in the data that most of the respondents are Female BSIE students. It is also shown in the da- ta that most of the respondents spent 6-10 hours working in their part-time job at a Fast-Food Chain restaurant. Most of the respondents have an average grade of 77 – 79/2.75 even though they have a part-time job. It is shown in the data that most of the respondents can manage their time even when they have a part-time job. It denotes that there is a significant relationship between the problem encountered by the re- spondents and their General Ave.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction distillée sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.
Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Communication savante | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Science ouverte | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule tête enseignante, pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».