Effects of feeding colostrum volume at 6%, 8%, 10%, or 12% of birth body weight on efficiency of immunoglobulin G absorption, gastric emptying, and postfeeding behavior in Holstein calves
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
Our objective was to evaluate how feeding colostrum at different volumes at the first feeding affects IgG absorption, gastric emptying, and calf behavior. Female Holstein calves (n = 88) were enrolled in a randomized block design to receive a single colostrum volume corresponding to 6%, 8%, 10%, or 12% of birth body weight (BBW). A subset of animals in 8 blocks (n = 32 calves) also received a gastric emptying marker acetaminophen (Ac) at a dose of 150 mg/kg metabolic body weight (BBW 0.75 ). Colostrum was administered within 2 h of birth via esophageal tube feeder. Blood samples were collected before (0 h) and 24 h after feeding. For the calves receiving Ac, plasma samples were also collected at 2, 4, 6, 8, 10, and 48 h after feeding. Colostrum and 24-h serum IgG concentrations were measured using radial immunodiffusion. Apparent efficiency of absorption (AEA) was calculated from 24-h serum IgG concentrations. Plasma Ac concentration was determined using an enzymatic colorimetric assay, and the proportion of Ac remaining in the stomach (Ac s ) at 8 h was modeled. Audio and video recordings of calf behavior during the first 2 h after feeding were analyzed with a custom ethogram. Data analysis was performed using mixed models or Fisher's exact tests as appropriate. Results are reported as LSM with 95% CI unless otherwise specified. The mean (range) BBW of calves was 40 (31.8–49.1) kg. Pooled colostrum had a median (range) Brix value of 24.2% (21.2%–29.6%) and IgG concentrations of 86.7 g/L (73.2–121.1 g/L). Calves in the 6%, 8%, 10%, and 12% groups were fed median (range) colostrum volumes (L) of 2.3 (2.0–2.8), 3.1 (2.5–3.9), 4.0 (3.5–4.5), and 4.8 (4.2–5.6), respectively. The 24-h serum IgG concentrations (g/L) were lowest in the 6% group (28.8 [25.8–31.8]), increased to 37.4 (34.4–40.4) in the 8% group, and were highest in the 10% and 12% groups (41.1 [38.1–44.1] and 43.4 [40.4–46.4], respectively). Group differences were observed for AEA (%), which gradually declined with an increasing feeding rate and was highest in the 6% and 8% groups (47.8 [44.9–50.7] and 46.2 [43.3–49.0], respectively), declined to 41.0 (38.1–43.9) in the 10% group, and was lowest at 36.3 (33.5–39.2) in the 12% group. At 8 h, Ac s (%) was 50.4 (43.8–57.0), 55.3 (49.2–61.5), 57.9 (51.8–64.0), and 65.5 (59.2–71.8) of the original dose in the 6%, 8%, 10%, and 12% groups, respectively. Group differences in behavior were identified for kicking, a colic-like behavior, which was observed only in the 10% (n = 21 kicks total) and 12% (n = 40 kicks total) groups. Feeding a single colostrum meal equivalent to 8% or 10% of BBW within 2 h after birth offers a compromise in terms of IgG absorption, gastric emptying, and calf behavior. A larger volume (12% BBW) resulted in marginal improvement in serum IgG concentration, reduced AEA and gastric emptying, and was associated with increased colic-like behaviors.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction machine sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.
Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Communication savante | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Science ouverte | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,000 | 0,001 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,001 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».