Advancing telemedicine and task-sharing to improve access to psychotherapy for perinatal populations
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
The Scaling Up Maternal Mental healthcare by Increasing access to Treatment (SUMMIT) trial (ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT04153864) examined two solutions to improving access to psychotherapy for perinatal populations: telemedicine and task-sharing with non-specialist providers (individuals without prior specialized training or experience in delivering mental healthcare). The SUMMIT trial showed that telemedicine and non-specialist-delivered psychotherapy were non-inferior to treatment delivered in-person or by a specialist mental health provider. Our aim was to conduct an implementation assessment of task-sharing and telemedicine to inform best practices when providing access to psychotherapy treatment for perinatal patients in real world healthcare settings. In this current study, we examined barriers and facilitators of task-sharing and telemedicine-delivered psychotherapy from a multistakeholder perspective (N = 105). We interviewed perinatal participants (n = 70) who received psychotherapy and specialist or non-specialist providers (n = 35) who delivered psychotherapy in the SUMMIT trial. We conducted an inductive thematic analysis. Our results show many facilitators of telemedicine across all stakeholder groups, including alleviating childcare needs through convenience, flexibly, and increased accessibility. Although perinatal participants and providers express that there are some benefits of in-person delivery (e.g., seeing physical cues and minimizing privacy concerns), we find that there are more barriers than facilitators of in-person psychotherapy. Regarding task-sharing, perinatal participants who received treatment from non-specialist and specialist providers report the same facilitators at similar rates, including capacity for active listening and empathy. Our implementation assessment shows that telemedicine and task-sharing are acceptable, feasible, and patient-centred solutions to improve access to evidence-based psychotherapies across healthcare settings. The Scaling Up Maternal Mental healthcare by Increasing access to Ṯreatment (SUMMIT) trial tested two approaches to improve access to mental healthcare for pregnant or postpartum patients with depression or anxiety. This included (1) task-sharing with non-specialists (e.g., nurses and midwives) delivering a brief talk therapy via (2) telemedicine (online delivery). We interviewed 70 pregnant or postpartum participants and 35 providers from the study to understand the benefits and challenges of these approaches. Many people found telemedicine helpful in reducing common challenges, such as the need for childcare and travel. While some preferred in-person visits to pick up on body language, more challenges were reported with in-person care. Participants who received therapy from a non-specialist had similar positive experiences to those who received therapy from a specialist (e.g. a psychologist, psychiatrist or social worker). Overall, the study shows that non-specialist and telemedicine-delivered therapy are practical, patient-centred ways to improve mental healthcare during and after pregnancy. Andrejek et al. evaluate the barriers and facilitators of leveraging telemedicine and task-sharing to improve access to psychotherapy for perinatal patients with symptoms of depression and anxiety in the SUMMIT trial. The qualitative implementation assessment demonstrates that both solutions are feasible, patient-centered approaches.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction distillée sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.
Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Communication savante | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Science ouverte | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule tête enseignante, pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».