Human-Centered Future: The Rise of Industry 5.0 in Corporate Sustainability Literature
Pourquoi ce travail est dans la base
Une base qui oublie comment elle a trouvé un travail ne peut pas être vérifiée. Voici les voies qui ont admis celui-ci.
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
In the second quarter of the 21st century, Industry 5.0 is considered as the most advanced stage of the industrial revolution, where the interaction between people and smart technologies has reached a new level. This assessment is not limited to the digital transformation of production processes, but also shaped by multidimensional sustainability elements such as environmental sensitivity, social benefit and ethical responsibility. The concept of Industry 5.0 seeks to build a manufacturing ecosystem grounded in sustainability and human-centric principles. The aim of this study is to reveal the current research trends in the international academic literature within the framework of the keywords “Industry 5.0” and “Sustainability” and to analyze the areas in which this conceptual framework is concentrated through bibliometric data. Building on this context, a total of 664 English-language scientific publications published between 2020 and 2025 in the Web of Science (WoS) Core Collection database were included in the scope of the analysis. The retrieved data were processed using RStudio Biblioshiny and VOSviewer software, and the publications were systematically evaluated according to their distribution across research fields, open access status, funding institutions, ongoing projects, influential conferences, leading journals, and prolific authors. The findings reveal that engineering, computer-related fields, and environmental sciences stand out as the disciplines contributing most to this area, while the fact that 71% of the publications are open access has gained particular attention. Furthermore, it was identified that funding bodies originating from the European Union and China provide the majority of financial support for this research domain. International conferences and publishers such as IFIP, IEEE, and ACM are among the most prominent platforms where the research is disseminated. As a result of the research, it is seen that the themes of Industry 5.0 and sustainability are met with increasing interest in the scientific literature; this interest is supported by multidisciplinary collaborations, global research funds and open access policies. This study contributes to identifying gaps in the literature and possible future research directions by revealing how Industry 5.0 is positioned in the context of sustainability.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Prédiction distillée sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.
Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Communication savante | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Science ouverte | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle